期刊文献+

CT诊断肾囊性病变价值的Meta分析 被引量:1

Diagnostic value of Computed Tomography for cystic renal masses:a meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的使用Meta分析探讨CT对肾囊性病变的诊断价值。方法以"CT、cystic、renal mass、囊性肾癌、肾囊性病变"等为关键词,检索Cochrane图书馆、OVID、Pub Med、Embase、中国知网、万方数据服务平台数据库中的文献资料。使用循证医学方法,对纳入的文献数据进行异质性检验,计算汇总灵敏度和特异度,建立受检者工作特征曲线(SROC),通过曲线下面积评估CT诊断肾囊性肿块的价值,并采用QUADAS标准进行文献质量评价。结果经检索总共纳入4篇文献,其中1篇为中文,3篇为英文。按照随机效应模型汇总,其汇总灵敏度和特异度分别为85%、66%,SROC曲线下面积为0.834 4。结论 CT对肾囊性病变具有较好的诊断和临床应用价值。 Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of Computed Tomography in the study of cystic renal masses by meta-analysis.Methods CT,contrast-enhanced CT,cystic renal masses were selected as the keywords.A collection in the Cochrane library,Pub Med,Embase,CNKI and the WANFANG DATA was performed to search the original data.The weighted sensitivity and specificity were calculated,as well as the summary receiver operating characteristic(SROC) curve.Further estimate of the diagnostic value of Computed Tomography in the research of cystic renal masses was performed by calculating the area under the curve.The quality of evidence in researches was assessed by the standard of QUADAS.Results A total of 4 literatures were adopted for meta-analysis,including one Chinese papers and three English articles.According to the random effects model,the weighted sensitivity and specificity were 85% and 66%,respectively,and the area under the curve was 0.8344.Conclusion Computed Tomography technology has a good diagnostic and clinical value in the research of cystic renal masses.
出处 《海南医学》 CAS 2015年第2期269-272,共4页 Hainan Medical Journal
基金 湖北医药学院附属太和医药循证医学"苗圃基金"项目(编号:EBM2013019)
关键词 CT 增强CT 肾囊性肿块 META分析 CT Contrast-enhanced CT Cystic renal masses Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA. Evaluation of cystic renalmasses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the bosniakclassification system [J]. Radiology, 2004, 231(2): 365-371.
  • 2Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, et al. The development of QUA-DAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accu-racy included in systematic reviews [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2003,3: 25-38.
  • 3Penny F Whiting,Marie E Weswood,Anne WS Rutjes,Johannes B Reitsma,Patrick NM Bossuyt,Jos Kleijnen,马章淳,钱楠.QUADAS评价:一种用于诊断性研究的质量评价工具(修订版)[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(7):531-536. 被引量:64
  • 4Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, et al. Meta-Disc: a software for me-ta-analysis of test accuracy data [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2006,12: 6-31.
  • 5Benjaminov 0,Atri M, O'Malley M, et al. Enhancing component onCT to predict malignancy in cystic renal masses and interobserveragreement of different CT features [J]. American Journal of Roent-genology, 2006, 186(3): 665-672.
  • 6Clevert DA, Minaifar N, Weckbach S,et al. Multislice computed to-mography versus contrast-enhanced ultrasound in evaluation ofcomplex cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification system[J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2008, 39(1-4): 171-178.
  • 7Quaia E, Beitolotto M, Cioffi V,et al. Comparison of contrast-en-hanced sonography with unenhanced sonography and contrast-en-hanced CT in the diagnosis of malignancy in complex cystic renalmasses [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 191(4): 1239-1249.
  • 8蒋珺,陈亚青,周永昌.囊性肾癌的超声造影与增强CT对照研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2008,24(10):1628-1631. 被引量:34
  • 9Bosinak MA. Difficulties in classifying cystic lesions of the kidney[J]. Urol Radiol, 1991,13(2): 91-93.
  • 10Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Mileto A, et al. Dual-source dual-energy CTevaluation of complex cystic renal masses [J]. American Journal ofRoentgenology, 2012, 199(5): 1026-1034.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Hartman DS, Davis CJ, Johns T, et al. Cystic renal cell carcinoma. Urology, 1986,28(2):145-153.
  • 2Hartman DS, Choyke PL, Hartman MS. From the RSNA refresher courses: a practical approach to the cystic renal mass. Radiographics, 2004,24(Suppl 1):S101 -115.
  • 3Bielsa O, Lloreta J, Gelabert-Mas A. Cystic renal cell carcinoma: pathological features, survival and implications for treatment. Br J Urol, 1998,82(1) :16-20.
  • 4Bosniak MA. Difficulties in classifying cystic lesions of the kidney. Urol Radiol, 1991,13(2) :91-93.
  • 5Robbin ML, Lockhart ME, Barr RG. Renal imaging with ultrasound contrast: current status. Radiol Clin North Am, 2003, 41 (5) :963-978.
  • 6Israel GM, Bosniak MA. An update of the Bosniak renal cyst clas sification system. Urology, 2005,66(3):484-488.
  • 7Helenon O, Correas JM, Balleyguier C, et al. Ultrasound of renal tumors. Eur Radiol, 2001,11(10) :1890-1901.
  • 8Kim AY, Kim SH, Kim YJ, et al. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography for the differentiation of cystic renal lesions: preliminary study. J Ultrasound Med, 1999, 18(9) :581-588.
  • 9Ascenti G, Mazziotti S, Zimbaro G, et al. Complex cystic renal masses: characterization with contrast enhanced US. Radiology, 2007,243(1) :158-165.
  • 10Whiting P,Rutjes AWS,Reitsma JB,et al.The development of QUADAS:a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematicreviews.BMC Medical Research Methodology,2003,3:25.

共引文献96

同被引文献16

  • 1Penny F Whiting,Marie E Weswood,Anne WS Rutjes,Johannes B Reitsma,Patrick NM Bossuyt,Jos Kleijnen,马章淳,钱楠.QUADAS评价:一种用于诊断性研究的质量评价工具(修订版)[J].中国循证医学杂志,2007,7(7):531-536. 被引量:64
  • 2Fleischer AC, Lyshchik A, Andrcoti RF, et al. Advances in sono- graphic detection of ovarian cancer: depiction of tumor neovascular- ity with microbubbles [J]. Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194(2): 343-348.
  • 3Whiting P, Weswood ME, Rutjes AW, et al. Evaluation of QUA- DAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accu- racy included in systematic reviews [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2006, 6(8): 9-19.
  • 4Zhang X, Mao Y, Zheng R, et al. The contribution of qualitative CEUS to the determination of malignancy in adnexal masses, inde- terminate on conventional US-a multicenter study [J]. PLoS One. 2014, 9(4): e93843.
  • 5Hu R, Xiang H, Mu Y, et al. Combination of 2- and 3-dimensional contrast-enhanced transvaginal sonography for diagnosis of small adnexal masses [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(11): 1889-1899.
  • 6Xiang H, Huang R, Cheng J, et al. Value of three-dimensional con- trust-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of small adnexal masses [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39(5): 761-768.
  • 7Huehon C, Metzger U, Bats AS, et al. Value of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasound for characterizing ad- nexal masses [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2012, 38(5): 832-840.
  • 8Gu P, Pan LL, Wu SQ, et al. CA 125, PET alone, PET-CT, CT and MRI in diagnosing recurrent ovarian carcinoma: a systematic re- view and meta-anlysis [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2009, 71 ( 1): 164-174.
  • 9张金娥,陈文卫,张玉国,盛余敬,刘勤.超声造影增强模式对卵巢肿瘤的诊断价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2009,20(8):620-622. 被引量:13
  • 10周琦,刘百灵,姜珏,雷小莹.彩色多普勒超声、超声造影及CA-125对卵巢病变的鉴别诊断价值[J].南方医科大学学报,2009,29(10):2007-2009. 被引量:14

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部