摘要
2013版《建设工程施工合同(示范文本)》根据工程实践经验并借鉴FIDIC《施工合同条件》中DAB模式设立了争议评审制度,与DAB相对比,国内的争议评审制度具有了"中国特色",同时作为国内一个新兴的争议解决方式,也存在不完善的地方.本文通过与DAB的对比,对新版施工合同中新增的争议解决方式——争议评审制度的来源、程序、效力进行深度分析,研究其在国内建筑市场的适应性及存在的问题,提出相应的操作建议.
According to practical experience and DAB ( Dispute Adjudication Board), 2013 version of the construc- tion contract, sets up dispute review system. Compared with DAB, domestic dispute review system has already had Chinese characteristics. Meanwhile, as a new way to dispute review, it has some drawbacks. Through the contrast with DAB, the article will make a deep analysis of the source, the procedure and the effectiveness. Then it will study the adaptability and existing problems in the domestic construction market and put forward some corresponding operation suggestions.
出处
《吉林建筑大学学报》
CAS
2015年第1期91-93,共3页
Journal of Jilin Jianzhu University