期刊文献+

电子病历尚“避责” 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 确保电子病历的法律效力,关键在于规范电子病历的锁定和封存。随着电子病历系统的广泛应用,其优势日益凸显,然而电子病历被普遍认为易被篡改,其证据效力也备受质疑,从而让医院头痛不已。2014年8月,北京市朝阳区人民法院(以下简称“朝阳法院”)正式向国家卫生计生委发出两份有关电子病历管理的司法建议函,提出“完善医疗机构电子病历的管理,维护医患双方的合法权益”,并在12月15日得到了国家卫生计生委的正式复函。
作者 曹原
出处 《中国医院院长》 2015年第1期30-31,共2页 China Hospital CEO
  • 相关文献

同被引文献20

  • 1Corrette Ploem and Sjef Gevers, Introduction of a Na- tional Electronic Patient Record in The Netherlands~ Some Legal Issues, European Journal of Health Law, 18 (2011) 191.
  • 2Sharona Hoffan and Andy Podgurski, E-Health Haz- ards: Provider Liability and Electronic Health Record Systems, BERKELEY TECHNOLOGY LAW JOUR- NAL, Vol. 24 :1528-1581 (2009).
  • 3D. Garets, M. Davis, "Electronic Medical Records vs. Electronic Health Records: Yes, there is a differ ence", A HIMSS Analytics White Paper, January 26, 2006.
  • 4Sokratis K. Katsikas, Security of the Electronic Medi- cal Record, Handbook of Medical and Healthcare Technologies, Springer New York, 2013, pp 401-416.
  • 5Peter Garrett and Joshua Seidman , EMR vs EHR- What is the Difference? [EB/OL]. 2011-08-04 (2015-4-29). http://www, healthit, gov/buzz-blog/electronic- health-and-medical-records/emr-vs-ehr-difference.
  • 6American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 [EB/OL]. 2010-06-01"? (201,5-4-29). http://www. gpo. gov/ f dsys / pkg/ BILI,S-111hr l enr / pdf/ BILI,S-111hr- lent. pdf, 114-120.
  • 7张东秀.97万美国人参与“蓝色按钮”计划[N].生命时报,2014—08—0572015—4—29.Blue Button, http .//www.whitehouse, gov/open/innovations/BlueButton.
  • 8Michael D. Ries MD, Electronic Medical Records: Friends or Foes Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Re search, (2014) 472 :16-21.
  • 9http ://conventions. coe. int/Treaty/en/Treaties/H1 ml/108, htm.
  • 10http ://conventions. coe. int/Treaty/EN/Reports/Ht ml/108, htm.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部