期刊文献+

超声造影和钼钯X线对乳腺肿物良恶性的诊断效能比较 被引量:8

Comparing diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and mammography in diagnosis of breast lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺CEUS和钼钯X线对乳腺肿物良恶性的诊断效能。方法收集接受乳腺肿物切除的患者164例共176个病灶,患者于术前接受乳腺CEUS和钼钯X线检查,以病理结果为金标准,比较这两种方法鉴别乳腺肿物良恶性的诊断效能。结果 176个肿物中,良性63个,恶性113个。CEUS和钼钯X线鉴别乳腺肿物良恶性的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.91、0.71(Z=4.69,P<0.05)。CEUS和钼钯X线诊断乳腺恶性病变的准确率、敏感度、特异度分别为88.64%(156/176)、92.04%(104/113)、82.54%(52/63)和69.32%(122/176)、75.22%(85/113)、58.73%(37/63)。结论CEUS鉴别乳腺肿物良恶性有较高的诊断效能。 Objective To explore the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS and mammography in diagnosis of breast lesions.Methods Comparing the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS and mammography in diagnosis of breast lesions according to pathological results by accessing 176 lesions of 164 patients who were examined by the two methods before surgery.Results There were 63 benign tumors,and 113 malignant tumors.Area under ROC curve of CEUS and mammography were 0.91and0.71,the difference was statistically significant(Z=4.69,P〈0.05).The diagnostic accuracy,sensibility and specificity of CEUS were 88.64%(156/176),92.04%(104/113),82.54%(52/63),respectively,mammography were 69.32%(122/176),75.22%(85/113),58.73%(37/63),respectively.Conclusion CEUS has high diagnostic efficacy in diagnosis of breast lesions.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期62-66,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(30872996) 教育部博士点基金(20120171110080) 广东省科技计划社会发展项目(2010B031100009)
关键词 乳腺肿物 造影剂 超声检查 乳房X线摄影术 Breast neoplasms Contrast media Ultrasonography Mammography
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献59

共引文献139

同被引文献80

  • 1Chaiwerawattana A,Thanasitthichai S,Boonlikit S,et al.Clinical outcome of breast cancer Bl-RADS 4 lesions during 2003-2008 in the National Cancer Institute Thailand[J].Asian Pac J Cancer Prev,2012,13(8):4063-4066.
  • 2Yoon JH,Kim MJ,Moon HJ,et al.Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4:positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it[J].Ultrasound Med Biol,2011,37(5):693-699.
  • 3Jiang YX,Liu H,Liu JB,et al.Breast tumor size assessment:comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound[J].Ultrasound Med Biol,2007,33(12):1873-1881.
  • 4Wang X,Xu P,Wang Y,et al.Contrst-enhanced ultrasonogrophic fingdings of different histopathologic type of breast cancer[J].Acta Radiol,2011,52(3):248-255.
  • 5Du J,Wang L,Wan CF,et al.Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast lesions:combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultravsound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging[J].Eur J Radiol, 2012,81(12):3890-3899.
  • 6Du WH,Liu LJ,Wang H,et al.The Clinical significance of real- time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of breast tumor[J].Cell Biochem Biophys,2012,63(2):117-120.
  • 7Liu H,Jiang YX,Liu JB,et al.Evaluation of breast lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound using the microvascular imaging technique:initial observations[J].Breast,2008,17(5):532-539.
  • 8Gidcumb E, Gao B, Shall J, et al. Carbon nanotube electron field emit- ters for x-ray imaging of human breast cancer [J]. Nanotechnology, 2014, 25(24): 245704.
  • 9Wang Z, Hauser N, Singer G, et al. Non-invasive classification of mi- cro calcifications with phase-contrast X-ray mammography [J]. Nat Commun, 2014, 15(5): 3797.
  • 10Li DL, Wei L, Wen XM, et al. The effects of X-ray irradiation on the proliferation and apoptosis of MCF-7 breast cancer cells [J]. Ultra- struct Pathol, 2014, 38(3): 211-216.

引证文献8

二级引证文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部