期刊文献+

Private Provision of Environmental Public Goods:A Pilot Program for Agricultural Heritage Conservation 被引量:1

环境公共物品的私人补偿:农业遗产保护的试点项目(英文)
原文传递
导出
摘要 While the true value of environmental goods may be captured in a one-off payment, it may be easier to add a smaler amount to a private good by means of donation and colect the total environmental value over time. For that, however we need to ensure the smaller amount of a heritage conservation donation added to a private good is adequate so that we can ifnd retailers to participate in such fund-raising activities. We test the contingent valuation method’s criterion validity by comparing their stated purchasing behavior with their actual behavior. The price increase from the addition of the donation did not affect total sales of the commodity. Adding a donation to specialized private goods may be an effective way to colect landscape and agricultural heritage conservation do-nations. Furthermore, our ifndings suggest that funds can be colected without affecting commodity sales. This ap-proach is effective in other environmental protection activities. 在一次性支付中,某种环境物品真正价值或许更容易如果它能以捐赠的方式加入私人物品中。我们研究了人们的购买行为并与问卷调查中所阐明的购买行为相对比。我们检验了条件价值法(Contingent Value Method,CVM)的效标效度,例如(检验)当捐赠被附加时人们所表现出与规定值的差异程度。结果表明价格上涨对商品的总销量有任何影响。把捐赠附加到私人物品中可能是种很有效的收集捐款形式。这些捐款被用于保护具有非排他性和非竞争性的景观或者作为景观一部分的农业遗产。此外,我们还可以表明,资金可以在不改变销售数量被收集。这种方法在其他环保活动也是很有效的。
出处 《Journal of Resources and Ecology》 CSCD 2014年第4期341-347,共7页 资源与生态学报(英文版)
基金 the Association of River Improvement Fund and the JSPS grant B, for young researchers 2010-2013, both of whom provided financial support for this work
关键词 contingent valuation method (CVM) willingness to Pay criterion validity agricultural heritageconservation 条件价值法(CVM) 支付意愿 效标效度 农业遗产 保护
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Chijimatsu H. Valuation Estimation of Tourists for the Rural Landscape (Nouson Keikan ni Taisuru Kankokyakuno Kachi Hyouka). Hokkaido University.
  • 2Cummings R G, G W Harrison, E E Rutstr6m. 1995. Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive- compatible? The American Economic Review, 85(1 ): 260-266.
  • 3Higuchi M, Yoshida K. 1998. Case analysis of the rural landscape policy Yufuin-cho -- Cost benefit analysis of rural amenity policy (Nouson Amenity Seisaku no Hiyo Futan to Beneki Hyouka-Yufuin-cho Nouson Keikan no Jirei). In: Agricultural Economics Research (Special Volume), The Agricultural Economics Society of Japan, 210-212.
  • 4Hiraoka A. 2001. Waterwheels and the natural features climate (Suisha to Fuudo). Tokyo: Kokin Shoin.
  • 5Johannesson M. 1997. Some further experimental results on hypothetical versus real willingness to pay. Applied Economics Letters, 4(8): 535-536.
  • 6List J A, C A Gallet. 2001. What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Environmental and Resource Economics. 20(3): 241-254.
  • 7Loomis J, T Brown, B Lucero, G Peterson. 1996. Improving validity experiments of contingent valuation methods: results of efforts to reduce the disparity of hypothetical and actual willingness to pay. Land Economics, 72(4): 450-461.
  • 8Maeda K. 1992. Japanese waterwheels and culture (Nihon no Suisha to Bunka). Tokyo: Tamagawa University Press.
  • 9Mitchell R C, R T Carson. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation methos. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 1989.
  • 10Neill H R, R G Cummings, P T Ganderton, et al. 1994. Hypothetical surveys and real economic commitments. Land Economics, 70(2): 145-154.

同被引文献14

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部