期刊文献+

我国腹腔镜外科的发展与国际化 被引量:10

Development and internationalization of laparoscopic surgery in current China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 腹腔镜外科在我国发展已有20余年时间。腹腔镜作为一种技术在普通外科领域中的应用范围不断拓宽,腹腔镜外科手术技术水平也不断提高。在腹腔镜技术的创新发展方面,相关图像系统已达高清及3D水平。此外,从传统腹腔镜发展到单孔腹腔镜、机器人手术、经自然孔内镜手术等,新技术不断涌现,使许多原本认为不可能的手术成为可能。我国腹腔镜外科领域亦在不断加强与欧、美、日等先进国家的交流,并已跻身世界腹腔镜外科大国的行列。 Laparoscopy has been widely used in general surgery of China for more than 20 years with the great improvement of the technique and the range of its application has been continuously popularized all over China. Besides the conventional laparoscopic technique, the single incision laparoscopy, robotic surgery, nature orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and 3D laparoscopic surgery have been also introduced to the laparoscopic surgeons in recent years, which makes some surgeries impossible into possible. Nowadays, the exchange among China and western countries and Japan has been continuously strengthened in terms of technique, research work and training in laparoscopic surgery, which will play an important role in the internationalized process.
出处 《上海医药》 CAS 2014年第23期1-1,2-3,16,共4页 Shanghai Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal
基金 国家863计划项目"腹盆腔外科LESS和NOTES关键技术临床应用研究及推广"(项目编号:2012AA021103)
关键词 腹腔镜 手术 国际化 laparoscopy surgery internationalization
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1National Gomprehensive Cancer Network. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in OncologyTM--Colon Cancer. J NCCN, 2009,7:778 - 831.
  • 2National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer[ EB/OL]. (2006-08-01) [ 2011-03- 10] http://www, nice. org. uk/nicemedia/live/l1588/33495/ 33495. pdf.
  • 3Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Guidelines for thetreatment of gastric cancer. 2nd ed. Tokyo : Kanehara, 2004.
  • 4Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial) : multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet,2005,365 (9472) : 1718-1726.
  • 5Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al. Laparoscopic surgery ver- sus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a ran- domised trial. Lancet 0ncol,2005,6 (7) :477-484.
  • 6Janson M, Bjrholt I, Carlsson P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg,2004,91(4) :409-417.
  • 7Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lain SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet, 2004,363(9416) :1187-1192.
  • 8Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med,2004,350(20) :2050-2059.
  • 9Lacy AM, Garcfa-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopyassisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2002, 359 (9325) :2224-2229.
  • 10Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colecto- my for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA,2002,287(3 ) : 321-328.

共引文献215

同被引文献94

引证文献10

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部