期刊文献+

Handling epistemic uncertainties in PRA using evidential networks

Handling epistemic uncertainties in PRA using evidential networks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In order to overcome the limitations of traditional methods in uncertainty analysis, a modified Bayesian network(BN), which is called evidence network(EN), was proposed with evidence theory to handle epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment(PRA). Fault trees(FTs) and event trees(ETs) were transformed into an EN which is used as a uniform framework to represent accident scenarios. Epistemic uncertainties of basic events in PRA were presented in evidence theory form and propagated through the network. A case study of a highway tunnel risk analysis was discussed to demonstrate the proposed approach. Frequencies of end states are obtained and expressed by belief and plausibility measures. The proposed approach addresses the uncertainties in experts' knowledge and can be easily applied to uncertainty analysis of FTs/ETs that have dependent events. In order to overcome the limitations of traditional methods in uncertainty analysis, a modified Bayesian network(BN), which is called evidence network(EN), was proposed with evidence theory to handle epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment(PRA). Fault trees(FTs) and event trees(ETs) were transformed into an EN which is used as a uniform framework to represent accident scenarios. Epistemic uncertainties of basic events in PRA were presented in evidence theory form and propagated through the network. A case study of a highway tunnel risk analysis was discussed to demonstrate the proposed approach. Frequencies of end states are obtained and expressed by belief and plausibility measures. The proposed approach addresses the uncertainties in experts' knowledge and can be easily applied to uncertainty analysis of FTs/ETs that have dependent events.
出处 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS 2014年第11期4261-4269,共9页 中南大学学报(英文版)
基金 Project(71201170)supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
关键词 不确定性分析 贝叶斯网络 证据理论 PRA 概率风险评估 传统方法 基本事件 网络传播 probabilistic risk assessment epistemic uncertainty evidence theory evidential network
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献18

  • 1符志民,李汉铃.航天研发项目风险分析、等级评估及相关性研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2005,27(1):52-59. 被引量:26
  • 2符志民.基于随机网络模拟的航天项目风险分析和评估[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(3):375-377. 被引量:7
  • 3徐克俊,金星,郑水煌.航天发射场可靠性安全性评估与分析技术[M].北京:固防工业出版社,2006.
  • 4NASA U S. Probabilistic risk assessment procedures guide for NASA managers and practitioners[R]. Washington, D. C. : Office of Safety and Mission Assurance NASA Headquarters, 2002.
  • 5DoD U S. Risk management guide for DoD acquisition[R]. Washington, D. C: Department of Defense,2006.
  • 6Pender S. Managing incomplete knowledge: why risk manage ment is not surfficient[J].lnternational Journal of Project Management , 2001,19( 1 ) : 79 - 87.
  • 7Oberkampf W L, Hehon J C, Joslyn C A, et al. Challenge problems: uncertainty in system response given uncertain parameters[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2004,85(1) ;9-11.
  • 8Samson S, Reneke J A, Wiecek M M. A review of different perspectives on uncertainty and risk and an arternative modeling paradigm[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009,94(4) :558 - 567.
  • 9Sharer G. A mathematical theory of evidence[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 10Yager R R, Liu L. Classiewrks of the Dempsger-Shafer theory of belieffumtions[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2008.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部