期刊文献+

Fuzzy TOPSIS method to primary crusher selection for Golegohar Iron Mine(Iran) 被引量:5

Fuzzy TOPSIS method to primary crusher selection for Golegohar Iron Mine(Iran)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Selection of the crusher required a great deal of design regarding to the mine planning. Selection of suitable primary crusher from all of available primary crushers is a multi-criterion decision making(MCDM) problem. The present work explores the use of technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) with fuzzy set theory to select best primary crusher for Golegohar Iron Mine in Iran. Gyratory, double toggle jaw, single toggle jaw, high speed roll crusher, low speed sizer, impact crusher, hammer mill and feeder breaker crushers have been considered as alternatives. Also, the capacity, feed size, product size, rock compressive strength, abrasion index and application of primary crusher for mobile plants were considered as criteria for solution of this MCDM problem. To determine the order of the alternatives, closeness coefficient is defined by calculating the distances to the fuzzy positive ideal solution(FPIS) and fuzzy negative ideal solution(FNIS). Results of our work based on fuzzy TOPSIS method show that the gyratory is the best primary crusher for the studied mine. Selection of the crusher required a great deal of design regarding to the mine planning. Selection of suitable primary crusher from all of available primary crushers is a multi-criterion decision making(MCDM) problem. The present work explores the use of technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) with fuzzy set theory to select best primary crusher for Golegohar Iron Mine in Iran. Gyratory, double toggle jaw, single toggle jaw, high speed roll crusher, low speed sizer, impact crusher, hammer mill and feeder breaker crushers have been considered as alternatives. Also, the capacity, feed size, product size, rock compressive strength, abrasion index and application of primary crusher for mobile plants were considered as criteria for solution of this MCDM problem. To determine the order of the alternatives, closeness coefficient is defined by calculating the distances to the fuzzy positive ideal solution(FPIS) and fuzzy negative ideal solution(FNIS). Results of our work based on fuzzy TOPSIS method show that the gyratory is the best primary crusher for the studied mine.
出处 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS 2014年第11期4352-4359,共8页 中南大学学报(英文版)
关键词 TOPSIS法 辊式破碎机 模糊集理论 伊朗 铁矿 选型 冲击式破碎机 矿山规划 primary crusher multi-criterion decision making(MCDM) technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution fuzzy set theory Golegohar Iron Mine gyratory crusher
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1HWANG C L, YOON K. Multiple attributes decision making methods and applications [M]. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 1981: 128-140.
  • 2BENITEZ J M, MARTIN J C, ROMAN C. Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry [J]. Tourism Management, 2007, 28(2): 544-555.
  • 3WANG M Y, ELHAG T M S. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment [J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2006, 31 (2): 309-319.
  • 4ONI~IT S, SONER S. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment [J]. Waste Manage, 2008, 28: 1552-1559.
  • 5GLIGORIC Z, BELJIC C, SIMEUNOVIC V. Shaft location selection at deep multiple orebody deposit by using fuzzy TOPSIS method and network optimization [J]. International Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 2010, 37(2): 1408-1418.
  • 6SAREMI M, MOUSAVI SF, SANAYEI A. TQM consultant selection in SMEs with TOPSIS under fuzzy environment [J]. Expert syst Appl 2009, 36(2): 2742-2749.
  • 7SUN C C, L1N G T R. Using fuzzy TOPSIS method for evaluating the competitive advantages of shopping websites [J]. Expert Syst Appl, 2009, 36:11764-11771.
  • 8TORFI F, ZANJIRAN1 FARAHANI R, REZAPOUR S. Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2010, 10(2): 520-528.
  • 9WANG J W, CHENG C H, CHENG H K. Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection [J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2009, 9: 377- 386.
  • 10ALAVI I, ALINEJAD-ROKNY H. Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for plant species selection (case study: Reclamation plan of Sungun Copper Mine; lran) [J]. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2011, 5(12): 1104-1113.

同被引文献59

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部