《嵩山文集》校勘札记

Notes for the Collation of SongShan Collection

《四部丛刊续编》所收宋人晁说之集《嵩山文集》系影印曹溶之藏本,惜其为抄本,难免有讹误之处。而《四库全书荟要》所收晁说之集《景迂生集》虽同为抄本但因皇帝御览,有馆臣校勘,故抄写较精。今以《四部丛刊续编》本《嵩山文集》为底本,参校《四库全书荟要》本、《四库全书》本《景迂生集》,发现《嵩山文集》讹误之处34条,遂加考订,议其是非,以期略有补焉。

Chao Yue - zhi＇ s SongShan Collection collected in The Sequel to the Four Branches of Literature is the photocopied version of Cao Rong＇ s collection, but it is a manuscript. Therefore, mistakes can hardly be avoided. On the other hand, Chao Yue - zhi＇ s JingYuSheng Collection collected in Selections from the Complete Library in the Four Branches of Literature is also a manuscript, but because the emperor read it and library ministers collated it, the manuscript is more accurate. Now taking SongShan Collection as the master copy, and taking Selections from the Complete Library in the Four Branches of Literature and JingYuSheng Collection in Complete Library in the Four Branches of Literature as references, the author finds out 34 errors in JingYuSheng Collection, and tries to examine and correct those errors.