期刊文献+

干细胞动员促进心肺复苏后大鼠脑损伤的修复 被引量:1

The mobilization of stem cells promote the recovery of the ischeInia brain injury after cardiopulmonary resuscitation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察粒细胞集落刺激因子(granulocyte colony-stimulating factor,G-CSF)与AMD3100动员自身骨髓干细胞治疗复苏后脑缺血损伤的效果,并探讨其作用机制。方法在中山大学心肺脑复苏研究所建立窒息法心肺复苏大鼠动物模型。56只SD大鼠随机(随机数字法)分4组:G—CSF单独动员组、G—CSF+AMD3100联合动员组、单纯复苏组和假手术组。通过NDS评分、纸带移除实验、头颅MR扫描影像分析等方法评价干细胞自体动员对复苏后神经功能的影响;采用ELISA法检测脑组织中血管内皮细胞生长因子(VEGF)含量、TUNEL法检测脑组织中神经细胞凋亡、免疫荧光法检测脑组织毛细血管密度变化。结果复苏后3d时,G—CSF+AMD3100组NDS评分(61.4±10.7)显著高于单纯复苏组(49.9±10.4)(P〈0.05),纸带移除时间为(85.5±28.9)s,显著短于单纯复苏组(148.1±23.8)s与G—CSF组(118.5±30.4)S(P〈0.05);脑MRI显示的脑损伤严重程度两个干细胞动员组低于单纯复苏组;G-CSF+AMD3100组的神经细胞凋亡率(0.23±0.06)显著低于G—CSF组(0.34±0.08)(P〈0.05),而两者均显著低于单纯复苏组(0.44±0.09)(P〈0.05)。在复苏后3d与6d,G-CSF+AMD3100组脑组织中VEGF质量浓度(pg/mL)分别为(106.2±23.3)与(79.9±18.4),G—CSF组脑组织VEGF质量浓度(pg/mL)分别为(50.6±13.7)与(73.9±16.6),均显著高于单纯复苏组(23.1±10.2)与(36.2±12.8)(P〈0.05)。G—CSF+AMD3100组在复苏后3d时的脑毛细血管密度(351.8±67.9)个/高倍视野,显著高于G—CSF组(301.4±77.3)个/高倍视野与单纯复苏组(250.4±48.0)个/高倍视野(P〈0.05)。在复苏后6d时,G—CSF组的脑毛细血管密度较3d时明显升高,为(348.4±76.7)个/高倍视野(P〈0.05),G—CSF+AMD3100组为(344.1±65.7)个/高倍视野,与3d时比较无明显变化。结论干细胞动员显著改善了复苏后大鼠神经功能状况,联合动员后神经功能恢复更加显著且恢复时间早于单独动员。干细胞动员对脑损伤的修复作用机制可能与抑制神经细胞凋亡、促进VEGF分泌及损伤区新生血管生成有关。 Objective To explore the therapeutic potential and mechanism of stem ceils mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and AMD3100 to repair global cerebral ischemia injuries in a rat model of cardiac arrest (CA) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods Cardiac arrest was induced by asphyxia. Fifty-six SD rats were randomly assigned into four groups: G-CSF group, G-CSF + AMD3100 group, CPR control group and sham operated group. The animals were sacrificed at 3d and 6d after CPR respectively. The neurological status and morphological changes of damaged cerebrum, the apoptosis of nerve cells and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expressed in brain tissue and capillary density in hippocampus and temporal lobe cortex were measured and analyzed by means of neurological deficit score (NDS), adhesive tape removal test (TRT), ELISA, MRI and immunofluorescence. Results NDS in G-CSF + AMD3100 group (61.4 ± 10. 7 ) was significantly higher than that in CPR control group (49. 9 ± 10. 4) at 3 d after CPR (P 〈0. 05). And less time consumption for TRT found in G-CSF + AMD3100 group (85.5 ±28.9) s rather than was in CPR control group (148. 1 ± 23.8) s and G-CSF group ( 118.5 ± 30. 4) s (P 〈 0. 05). The severity of cerebral injury assessed by MRI was significantly milder at both 3 d and 6 d in the two stem cell mobilization groups. The apoptosis rate of nerve cells in G-CSF + AMD3100 group (0. 23 ± 0. 06) was significantly lower than that in G-CSF group (0. 34 ± 0. 08) at 3 d after CPR, and that in both stem cell mobilization groups was lower than that in CPR control group (0.44 ± 0.09) ( P 〈 0. 05 ). At 3 d and 6 d after CPR, the levels of VEGF in brain tissue were (106. 2 ±23.3) pg/mL and (79. 9 ± 18.4) pg/mL in G-CSF + AMD3100 group, and were (50. 6 ± 13.7) pg/mL and (73.9 ± 16. 6) pg/mL in G-CSF group, which were both significantly higher than that in CPR control group (23.1 ± 10. 2) pg/mL and ( 36. 2 ± 12. 8 ) pg/mL ( P 〈 0.05 ). At 3 d after CPR, the cerebral capillary density (351.8 ± 67.9) branches in every high power field (A/HPF) was significantly higher in G-CSF ± AMD3100 group than that (301.4 ±77. 3) A/HPF in G-CSF group and (250. 4 ±48. 0) A/HPF in CPR control group (P 〈 0. 05 ) . The cerebral capillary density in G-CSF group elevated to (348.4 ±76. 7) A/HPF at 6 d after CPR which was significantly higher than that at 3 d (P 〈0.05), and there was no difference between that at 3 d and 6 d in G-CSF + AMD3100 group. Conclusions The mobilization stem cells improve the impaired neurological function. The increased expression of VEGF in brain tissue, the neo-vascularization promoted by the mobilized stem cells and the inhibition of nerve cell apoptosis may be associated with the protective effects of the stem cell mobilization.
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期22-27,共6页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 非直属附属医院国家自然科学基金培育专项基金(PYZX2011004)
关键词 心搏骤停 心肺复苏 干细胞动员 大鼠 粒细胞集落刺激因子 神经功能缺损评分 Cardiac arrest Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Stem cell mobilization Rats Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor Neurological deficit score
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Cart BG, Kahn JM, Merchant RM, et al. Inter-hospital variability in post-cardiac arrest mortality [ J ]. Resuscitation, 2009, 80 (1): 30-34.
  • 2Shyu WC, Lin SZ, Yang HI, et al. Functional recovery of stroke rats induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-stimulated stem cells [J]. Circulation, 2004, 110 (13): 1847-1854.
  • 3Sesti C, Hale SL, Lutzko C, et al. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and stem cell factor improve contractile reserve of the infarcted left ventricle independent of restoring muscle mass [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2005, 46 (9) : 1662-1669.
  • 4朱军,方向韶,符岳,姜骏,李恒,梁嘉康,黄子通.窒息法与室颤法心肺复苏动物模型的比较研究[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2011,20(1):14-19. 被引量:18
  • 5Jia X, Kocnig MA, Nickl R, et al. Early electrophysiologic markers predict functional outcome associated with temperature manipulation after cardiac arrest in rats [ J ]. Crit Care Med, 2008, 36 (6): 1909-1916.
  • 6Albertsmeier M, Teschendorf P, Popp E, et al. Evaluation of a tape removal test to assess neurological deficit after cardiac arrest in rats [J]. Resuscitation, 2007, 74 (3) : 552-558.
  • 7Dawson DA, Ruetzler CA, Hallenbeck JM. Temporal impairment of microcirculatory perfusion following focal cerebral ischemia in the spontaneously hypertensive rat [J]. Brain Res, 1997, 749 (2) : 200-208.
  • 8Zohlnhofer D, Dibra A, Koppara T, et al. Stem cell mobilization by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for myocardial recovery after acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2008, 51 (15) : 1429-1437.
  • 9Perea G, Sureda A, Martino R, et al. Predictive factors for a successful mobilization of peripheral blood CD34 + ceils in multiple myeloma [J]. Ann Hematol, 2001, 80 (10) : 592-597.
  • 10Roberts AW, DeLuca E, Begley CG, et al. Broad inter-individual variations in Circulating progenitor cell numbers induced by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy [ J]. Stem Ceils, 1995, 13 (5):512-516.

二级参考文献10

  • 1符岳,方向韶,罗志刚,黄子通.大鼠电刺激诱发心室颤动和机械性心肺复苏模型的建立[J].岭南急诊医学杂志,2007,12(1):1-3. 被引量:6
  • 2Sun S,Tang W,Song F,et al.The effects of epinephrine on outcomes of normothermic and therapeutic hypothermic cardiopulmonary resuscitation[J].Crit Care Med,2010,38(11):2175-2180.
  • 3Vaagenes P,Safar P,Moossy J,et al.Asphyxiation versus ventricular ?brillation cardiac arrest in dogs.Differences in cerebral resuscitation effects-a preliminary study[J].Resuscitation,1997,35(1):41-52.
  • 4Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2010 Update:A Report From the American Heart Association[J].Circulation,2010,121:e46-e215.
  • 5Berg RA,Hemphill R,Abella BS,et al.Adult Basic Lifie Support:2010American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care[J].Circulation,2010,122(18Suppl 3):S685-S705.
  • 6Heumar RW,Otto CW,Link MS,et al.Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support:2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care[J].Circulation,2010,122(18 Suppl 3):S729-S767.
  • 7Miran Kolar,Miljenko Kri maric,Petra Klemen,et al.Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide successful predicts cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the field:a prospective observational study[J].Critical Care,2008,12(5):R115.
  • 8Milana P,Emanuel N,Jaroslav K,et al.A sudden increase in partial pressure end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) at the moment of return of spontaneous circulation[J].J Emerg Med,2010,38(5):614-621.
  • 9周世方,陈寿权,李章平,王万铁,章杰,晏平,黄唯佳,程俊彦,李惠萍.乌司他丁对大鼠心肺复苏后血清与海马CA1区S100β蛋白变化的作用[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2009,18(2):170-174. 被引量:14
  • 10王晓红,方向韶,黄子通,符岳,李文静.血红素氧合酶对复苏后心功能不全的保护作用[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2009,18(4):380-385. 被引量:7

共引文献17

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部