期刊文献+

淋巴结转移率评价腋窝淋巴结转移的保乳治疗乳腺癌患者预后的价值 被引量:15

Prognostic value of metastatic axillary lymph node ratio in node-positive breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨淋巴结转移率(LNR)评价接受保留乳房治疗(BCT)并发生腋窝淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者的预后是否优于pN分期。方法回顾性分析1998--2007年问152例接受BCT并发生腋窝淋巴结转移的原发浸润性乳腺癌患者的临床资料,比较LNR和pN分期评价乳腺癌患者无病生存率和总生存率的价值。结果152例患者中,pN1期114例,pN2期23例,pN3期15例。LNR≤0.20者114例,LNR为0.21~0.65者26例,LNR〉0.65者12例。单因素分析显示,淋巴结切检总数、pN分期、LNR、雌激素受体状态、孕激素受体状态、放疗均与患者的无病生存率和总生存率有关(均P〈0.05);诊断年龄和化疗方案仅与患者的总生存率有关(均P〈0.05)。多因素分析显示,LNR为影响患者无病生存率和总生存率的独立因素(均P〈0.05),而pN分期与患者的无病生存率和总生存率无关(均P〉0.05)。在不同pN分期中,LNR也与患者的预后有关。结论在评价接受BCT、发生淋巴结转移的乳腺癌患者预后时,LNR作为一个独立的预测指标,更优于pN分期。 Objective To evaluate the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) as compared with the number of pN staging in patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of the clinical data of patients who received breast conserving surgery and with positive lymph nodes (n = 152) between 1998 and 2007. The disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared based on the LNR and pN staging. Results A total of 152 patients were classified as pN1 in 114, pN2 in 23, and pN3 in 15 cases. Among the 152 cases, 114 cases had a LNR ≤0.20, 26 cases had 0.21-0.65, and 12 cases had a LNR 〉0.65. Univariate analysis showed that number of dissected lymph nodes, LNR, pN stage, ER/PR status and radiotherapy were significant prognostic factors for DFS and OS ( P 〈 0.05 for all). Age and chemotherapy were prognostic factors only for OS (P 〈 0. 05 ). Multivariate analysis indicated that LNR was an independent prognostic factor for DFS and OS ( P 〈 0.05 for both), pN stage had no significant effect on DFS or OS ( P 〉 0. 05 for both). In the pN subgroup analysis, LNR was also showed to be significantly correlated with the prognosis of patients. Conclusions LNR is superior to pN staging as a prognostic factor in axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer patients treated by breast conservation surgery, and can be used as one of independent prognostic predictors for the patients.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期41-46,共6页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
基金 天津市自然科学基金项目(11JCZDJC28000)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 乳房切除术 区段 淋巴结转移数 淋巴结转移率 预后 Breast Neoplasms Mastectomy, Segmental Lymph node ratio pN stage Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Wu SC. He ZY, Li Q, et al. Prognostic value of metastatic axillary lymph node ratio for Chinese breast cancer patients[J]. rLoS One, 2013,8(4) ;e61410.
  • 2Dings PJ, Elferink MA, Strobbe W, et al. The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in node-positive breast cancer; a Dutch nationwide population-based study[J]. Ann Surg Oncol , 2013, 20(8) ;2607-2614.
  • 3Bai 1.5, Chen C. Gong YP. et al. Lymph node ratio is more predictive than traditional lymph node stratification in lymph node positive invasive breast cancer[J]. Asian PacJ Cancer Prev , 2013, 14 (2) ;753-757.
  • 4张保宁,邵志敏,乔新民,李波,姜军,杨名添,王水,宋三泰,张斌,杨红健.中国乳腺癌保乳治疗的前瞻性多中心研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(11):680-684. 被引量:247
  • 5张保宁,余子豪.乳腺癌保乳手术的几个关键问题[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2001,23(6):523-524. 被引量:107
  • 6Veronesi U, Zurrida S, Vinle G, et al. RethinkingTNM; a breast cancer classification to guide to treatment and facilitate research[J]. BreastJ. 2009, 15 (3) ;291-295.
  • 7Vinh-Hung V, Verkooijen HM, Fioreua G, et al. Lymph node ratio as an alternative to pN staging in node-positive breast cancer[J].J Clin Oncol, 2009, 27(7) ;1062-1068.
  • 8Ibrahim EM, Elkhodary TR, ZekriJM, et al. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in poor prognosis node-positive breast cancer patients in Saudi Arabia[J]. Asia PacJ Clin Oncol , 2010. 6 (2) ; 130-137.
  • 9Danko ME, Bennett KM. ZhaiJ. et al, Improved staging in node?positive breast. cancer patients using lymph node ratio; results in I ,788 patients with long-term follow-up[J].J Am Coli Surg, 2010,210(5) ;797-805.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Bedwinek J. Treatment of stage I and Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the breast by tumor excision and irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1981,7: 1553-1559.
  • 2Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A, et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J Clin Oncol,2000, 18: 1668-1675.
  • 3Smitt MC, Nowels KW, Zdeblick MJ, et al. The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long-term results of breast conservation. Cancer, 1995,76:259-267.
  • 4Bartelink H, Horiot JC, Poortmans P, et al. Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation. N Engl J Med,2001,345:1378-1387.
  • 5National Institutes of Health. NIH consensus conference on the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. JAMA,1991,265:391-395.
  • 6Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med,2002,347: 1233-1241.
  • 7Liljegren G, Holmberg L, Bergh J, et al. 10-Year results after sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol,1999,17:2326-2333.
  • 8Renton SC, Gazet JC, Ford HT, et al. The importance of resection margin in conservative surgery for breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol,1996,22:17-22.
  • 9Clark RM, Whelan T, Levine M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of breast irradiation following lumpectomy and axillary dissection for node-negative breast cancer: an update. Ontario Clinical Oncology Group. J Natl Cancer Inst,1996,88:1659-1664.
  • 10Forrest AP, Stewart HJ, Everington D, et al. Randomised controlled trial of conservation therapy for breast cancer: 6-year analysis of the Scottish trial. Scottish Cancer Trials Breast Group. Lancet,1996,348:708-713.

共引文献343

同被引文献110

  • 1中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会.中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2011版)[J].中国癌症杂志,2011,21(5):367-417. 被引量:268
  • 2朱亚东.乳腺癌术后无瘤生存率的影响因素及腋窝淋巴结检测数目的临床意义[J].实用癌症杂志,2014,29(2):222-225. 被引量:8
  • 3毛杰,海健,唐利立,邬玉辉,欧慧英,刘少华,罗沙阳.乳腺癌组织中C-erbB-2、nm23基因的表达及其预后的关系[J].中国现代医学杂志,2005,15(9):1321-1323. 被引量:10
  • 4梁芳,赵新,陈德荣,等.rim23及C-erbB-2在原发性乳腺癌中的表达及与预后的相关性[J].中国医学与理论实践,2007,17(7):748-749.
  • 5Milioli H H, Santos Sousa K, Kaviski R, et al. Comparative pro- teomics of primary breast carcinomas and lymph node metastases outlining markers of tumor invasion [ J ]. Cancer Genomics Pro- teomics, 2015,12(2) :89 - 102.
  • 6Kassouf W, Agarwal P K, Herr H W, et al. Lymph node density is superior to TNM nodalstatus in predicting disease-specific sur- vival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer : analysis of pooled data from MDACC and MSKCC[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2008,26(1) : 121 -6.
  • 7Yamashita K, Ooki A, Sakuramoto S, et al. Lymph node metasta- sis density (ND)-factor association with malignant degree and ND40 as "non-curative factor" in gastric cancer[ J]. Anticancer Res, 2008,28(1B) :435 -41.
  • 8Yamashita K, Katagiri H, Ishii K, et al. Preoperative serum CA19-9 and dissected peripancreatic tissue margin as determiners of long-term survival in pancreatic cancer[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2009,16(5) :1231 -40. Ooki A, Yamashita K, Kobayashi N, et al. Lymph node metasta- sis density and growth pattern as independent.
  • 9prognostic factors in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. World J Surg, 2007,31 ( 11 ) :2184 - 91.
  • 10Nancy H,Ruddle.Lymphatic vessels and tertiary lymphoid organs[J].The Journal of clinical investigation,2014,124(3):953-959.

引证文献15

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部