期刊文献+

扩散加权成像鉴别胰腺癌与肿块型慢性胰腺炎的Meta分析 被引量:12

Evaluation of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Distinguishing Pancreatic Carcinoma from Mass- Forming Chronic Pancreatitis: A Meta Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对磁共振扩散加权成像(DWI)鉴别诊断胰腺癌和肿块型慢性胰腺炎的文献进行汇总复习,评价DWI对胰腺癌与肿块型慢性胰腺炎的鉴别诊断价值。方法检索主要中、英文数据库,提取相关参数,采用Stata12.0及Meta-Disc 1.4软件进行Meta分析。结果 DWI对该两种疾病鉴别诊断汇总敏感度为0.864(95%CI:0.799,0.910),汇总特异度为0.816(95%CI:0.716,0.886),汇总阳性似然比4.694(95%CI:3.013,7.312),汇总阴性似然比0.167(95%CI:0.114,0.244),汇总诊断比值比为28.137(95%CI:15.562,50.872),汇总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)下面积(AUC)为0.91(95%CI:0.88,0.93)。结论 DWI用于鉴别诊断胰腺癌与肿块型慢性胰腺炎具有较高的诊断准确性。 Objective To make a comprehensive literature review of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in differentia- ting pancreatic carcinoma with mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) by using meta analysis, and to evaluate MR dif- fusion weighted imaging in differentiating pancreatic carcinoma with MFCP. Methods The main Chinese and English data base, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases, CNKI, CBM, WAN FANG, etc. were researched for the studies concerning DWI differentiation of pancreatic carcinoma with mass-forming chronic pancreatitis. The relevant parameters were extracted, and meta analysis was conducted by using Stata 12.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Methodologi- cal quality was assessed by QUADAS tool. Results A total of 9 studies, with 417 patients who fulfilled all of the inclu- sion criteria, were selected for the analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of DWI in differentiating pancreatic carci- noma with mass-forming chronic pancreatitis were 0. 864 (95% CI:0. 799, 0. 910) and 0. 816 (95% CI:0. 716, 0. 886) respectively. The LR + and LR- were 4. 694 (95% C1:3. 013, 7. 312) and 0. 167 (95% C1:0.114, 0.244) respectively. DOR was 28. 137 (95 % CI : 15. 562 - 50. 872). The area under the curve of the summary receiver operating characteristic was 0.91 (95% C1:0, 88,0, 93 ), Conclusion MR diffusion-weighted imaging carries higher diagnostic accuracy in dif- ferentiating pancreatic carcinoma with mass-forming chronic pancreatitis.
出处 《临床放射学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期70-74,共5页 Journal of Clinical Radiology
关键词 表观扩散系数 扩散加权成像 磁共振成像 META分析 胰腺肿瘤 胰腺癌 Apparent diffusion coefficient Diffusion-weighted imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Meta-analysis Pancreatic tumor Pancreatic adenocarcinoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1Glasziou P,Irwig L,Bain C,et al.Systematic reviews in health care:A practical guide.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press 2001.
  • 2Decks J.Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests.In:Systematic Reviews in Health Care:Metaanalysis in context Edited by:Egger M,Davey Smith G,Altman D.London:BMJ Publishing Group;2001.Second edition.
  • 3Whiting P,Rutjes A,Dinnes J,et al.A systematic review of existing quality assessment tools used to assess the quality of diagnostic research submitted.
  • 4Streiner DL,Norman GR.Health measurement scales:a practical guide to their development and use.Oxford:Oxford University Press 1995.
  • 5Jadad AR,Moore A,Carroll D,et al.Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials:is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials,1996,17:1-12.
  • 6Juni P,Altman DG,Egger M.Assessing the quality of controlled trals.BMJ,2001,323:42-46.
  • 7Juni P,Witschi A.Bloch Rmet al.The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analvsis.JAMA.1999,282:1054-1060.
  • 8Greenland S.Invited Commentary:A critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods.A J Epidemiol,1994,140:290-296.
  • 9Whiting P,Dinnes J,Rutjes AWS,et al.A systematic review of how quality assessment has been handled in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.submitted.
  • 10Whiting P,Rutjes AWS,Dinnes J,et al.The development and validation of methods for assessing the quality and reporting of diagnostic studies.Health Technol Assess in press.

共引文献86

同被引文献73

引证文献12

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部