摘要
目的探讨电化学发光法与放射免疫法判断甲状腺功能亢进的效果差异,为临床甲亢的诊断提供参考。方法选择甲亢患者289例和健康对照组260例,分别运用化学发光法和放射免疫法对各样本的血清中FT3,FT4,TSH含量进行检测,分别比较两种检测方法甲亢组与健康对照组的检测值,并比较两种方法甲亢组FT3,FT4,TSH的临床诊断符合率。结果两种检测方法甲亢组FT3,FT4,TSH含量均高于健康对照组,但临床诊断符合率化学发光法优于放射免疫法。结论化学发光法临床诊断符合率高于放射免疫法。
Objective To investigate the difference of chemiluminescence and radioimmunity detecting hyperthyroid-ism and to provide reference for clinical detection of hyperthyroidism.Methods 289 patients with hyperthyroidism and 260 control group were choose.FT3,FT4,TSH in their serum specimen were detected with chemiluninescence and ra-dioimmunity.The results were compared between patients and control each of chemiluninescence and radioimmunity. And coincidence rate of clinical diagnosis with FT3,FT4,TSH were compared between chemiluninescence and radioim-munity.Results FT3,FT4,TSH of patients were higher than those of control in both chemiluninescence and radioim-munity.And coincidence rate of clinical diagnosis with chemiluninescence was higher than radioimmunity.Conclusion coincidence rate of clinical diagnosis with chemiluninescence was higher than radioimmunity.
出处
《中国实验诊断学》
2014年第6期966-967,共2页
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Diagnosis
关键词
甲亢
化学发光法
放射免疫法
hyperthyroidism
chemiluninescence
chemiluninescence