摘要
同行评议(Peer Review)是学术界控制和保证科研质量的重要方式之一,在学术评价中不可或缺。但在实际操作中,同行评议常常出现偏差,存在很多问题。首先基于所下载的同行评议研究文献,利用Cite Space可视化软件识别出国内外同行评议存在的问题;然后从同行专家自身角度出发,从利益相关和认知惯性视角分析同行评议诸多问题产生的深层次原因;在原因分析基础上,提出加强学习、辅以定量方法、开放评审和公众评审等对策。
Peer review is an important method to guarantee the research quality in academic field, and it＇ s necessary in the evaluation of the academic field. But during the actual operation, peer review always occurs with deviation and lots of problems. This paper uses CiteSpace visual software to identify the problems in the peer review. Then, from the perspective of peer experts, with stakeholder factors and cognitive inertia, we analyze the deeper reasons for the generation of peer re- view. Based on the above analysis, we propose four measures： reinforce learning, supplemented by quantitative method, open review and public review.
出处
《科技管理研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期163-166,172,共5页
Science and Technology Management Research
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“人文社会科学评价中同行评议与科学计量相结合的机理分析和对策研究”(11BTQ21)
中央基本科研业务费专项人文社科重点项目“基于科学计量方法的人文社会科学代表性论文评价研究”(DUT14RW201)
关键词
同行评议
利益相关
认知惯性
思维惯性
定量方法
peer review
stakeholder
cognitive inertia
thinking inertia
quantitative method
