期刊文献+

基于LCA法对比传统铬鞣工艺和改性戊二醛鞣工艺 被引量:7

The Comparison of the Conventional Chrome Tanning Process and the Modified Glutaraldehyde Tanning Process Based on LCA Methodology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用GaBi4模拟传统铬鞣工艺和改性戊二醛鞣工艺,利用生命周期评价(LCA)法对其结果进行评价,并结合荷兰莱顿大学环境科学中心(CML)开发的CML2001分析工具,找出鞣革工艺中影响最大的方面及每个工序对各环境类别所产生的影响。结果表明,就鞣革工艺、电力、热能及废水处理而言,两种鞣革工艺对9个环境类别的贡献都较为显著,传统铬鞣工艺的贡献高于改性戊二醛鞣工艺,表明改性戊二醛鞣工艺较传统铬鞣工艺对环境更为友好。两种工艺的鞣制工序对环境的危害最大。在研究开发或实施清洁化鞣革工艺时,应重点关注鞣制工序,这是减轻鞣革工艺对环境污染最主要也是最直接的方法。 The conventional chrome tanning process and the modified glutaraldehyde tanning process were modeled by using GaBi 4 software, and the results have be analyzed by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Then the most effective part of the tanning process and each procedure's impact of various environmental categories were found out by CML2001 which is developed by the Environmental Sciences Institute of Leiden University (CML). According to tanning process, electricity consumption, energy consumption and waste water treatment, the result shows that the contribution of the tanning process to these nine environmental categories is more remarkable than others. And the contribution of the conventional chrome tanning process is higher than that of the modified glutaraldehyde tanning one. Besides, according to the tanning process itself, the contribution of the tanning procedure to the environment is predominant. So ,More attention should be paid to the modified glutaradehyde tanning process which can reduce the environment pollution.
出处 《皮革科学与工程》 CAS 2015年第1期5-12,共8页 Leather Science and Engineering
关键词 GaBi4 生命周期评价(LCA) 传统铬鞣工艺 改性戊二醛鞣工艺 CML2001 GaBi d Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) conventional chrome tanning process modified glutaraldehyde tanningprocess CML 2001
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1魏善明,王成斌,蔡杰,任国平.制革工业中的清洁生产[J].皮革科学与工程,2010,20(2):39-40. 被引量:13
  • 2陈亮,刘玫,黄进.GB/T 24040-2008《环境管理 生命周期评价原则与框架》国家标准解读[J].标准科学,2009(2):76-80. 被引量:26
  • 3Education GB. Handbook for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) [J]. Using the GaBi Education Software Package, PEInternational, 2009:27-58.
  • 4NotarnicolaB, PuigR, RaggiA, et al. LCA of Italian and Spanish bovine leather production systems in an industrial ecology perspective [C]. The 5th Australian Conference on Life Cycle Assessment, Melbourne, 2006:22-25.
  • 5CastielloD, PueeiniM, SeggianiM, et al. Life cycle assess- ment (LCA) of the oxidative unhairing process by hydrogen peroxide [J]. The Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 2008, 103(1):1-6.
  • 6单晨,丁绍兰.牛皮革与PU革的生命周期评价比较[J].西部皮革,2011,33(6):12-15. 被引量:4
  • 7廖隆理.制革化学与工艺学[M].北京:科学出版社,2005.341-362.
  • 8Jayakumar GC, Bala LS, Kanth SV, et al. Combination tanning system based on dialdehyde alginic acid: An ecofriendly organic approach [J]. Journal of American Leather Chemists Association, 2011, 106: 50-58.
  • 9Zhou H, TanZ, Li X. Assessment of wastewater pollution in pig leather industry in China [J]. Water and Environment Journal, 2012, 26(4):521-529.
  • 10国家统计局的统计年鉴官网,网址<?http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/>.

二级参考文献17

共引文献68

同被引文献130

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部