期刊文献+

农户参与横向分工:测度及其比较--来自广东的农户问卷 被引量:18

Farmers, Participation in Horizontal Division:Measure and Comparison -A Questionnaire from Farmers in Guangdong
下载PDF
导出
摘要 农业的专业化是农业经营方式转变的重要方面。文章阐述了农户参与横向分工与专业化的主要方式和决定机理,构建了农户种植业分工与专业化的指标,并基于广东省农户的问卷调查,对农户种植业横向专业化的影响因素进行了测度、分析和比较,得出:粮食的专业化程度受土地规模的影响较大,较高的专业化程度须匹配较大规模,即较大的种植面积和相对较少的地块数;蔬菜的专业化程度受土地规模的影响较小,而农业劳动力的弱质化对其影响亦不是很大;水果花卉受土地规模、市场销售、劳动力弱质化、资本投入、村庄交通条件等的影响较大。 The specialization of agriculture is an important aspect in the change of agricultural management. This paper expounds the main mode and decision mechanism of farmer ' s participation in the horizontal division of labor and specialization and builds the index of farmers planting division of labor and specialization. Based on the questionnaire of Guangdong province, this paper measures, analyzes and compares the influencing factors of farmer's planting horizontal specialization. The result shows that the specialization degree of grain is greatly influenced by land scale, higher degree specialization shall be matched with larger scale, that is, larger planting areas and comparably smaller land fields. Specialization degree of vegetables is slightly influenced by land scale, while weakness of agricultural labors is not influenced by it. Fruits and flowers are largely affected by land scale, market, labor weakness, capital investment, transportation in villages. Therefore, this paper puts forward some relevant suggestions.
作者 罗必良
出处 《华中农业大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2015年第2期1-9,共9页 Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目“农村土地与相关要素市场培育与改革研究”(71333004) 教育部创新团队发展计划“中国农村基本经营制度”(IRT-14R17) 国家社会科学基金顼目“分工经济、服务外包与农业规模经营方式创新研究”(14BJY111) 国家社会科学基金项目“产权垄断、禀赋效应与农地流转抑制”(13CJL048)
关键词 专业化经营 横向分工 集中度 种植规模 specialized operation horizontal division of labor concentration planting scale
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献70

  • 1姚洋.农地制度与农业绩效的实证研究[J].中国农村观察,1998(6):3-12. 被引量:295
  • 2郑风田,程郁.我国农村产业簇群的合作效率分析——云南斗南花卉个案分析[J].中国农村观察,2005(4):14-24. 被引量:13
  • 3庞巴维克.《资本实证论》[M].商务印书馆,1981年版.第169,170,167页.
  • 4李小建.中国中部农区发展研究[M].北京:科学出版社.2010.
  • 5Boggess, W. G, Anaman, K. A. and Hanson, G. D. :Importance, causes and management responses to farm risks: evidence from Florida&Albama, So, J. Agric. Econ, 1985 ( 17 ) : 105 - 116.
  • 6Dercon,S. , Risk, Crop Choice, and Savings: Evidence from Tanzania, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 44, No. 3, (Apr. ,1996) :485 -513.
  • 7Dillon J. L. and Scandizzo, P. L. Risk attitudes of subsistence farmers in Northeast Brazil:A Sampling Approach, American Journal of Agricultural Eeonomcis, 1978,63 ( 3 ) :425 - 435.
  • 8Elamin, E. , Rogers, L. F. , Estimation and use of risk aversion coefficient for traditional dryland agriculture in western Su- dan. Agricuhutral Economics, 1992 (7) : 155 - 166.
  • 9Lawernce, K. , Risk sensitivity and value among Andean pastoralists : measures, models, and empirical test. Current Anthropology, 2001, 42(3) :432 -440.
  • 10Mette,W. and Stein, H. Experimental studies of peasant's attitudes towards risk in Northern Zambia. Discussion Paper#D-14-/1998.

共引文献344

同被引文献351

引证文献18

二级引证文献240

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部