期刊文献+

高温储藏下小麦淀粉和蛋白质消化率变化规律研究 被引量:4

Digestibility of Starch and Protein During Accelerated Aging of Wheat
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了40℃条件下人工加速陈化对小麦籽粒淀粉和蛋白质消化率的影响。结果表明,人工陈化12周的小麦籽粒中快消化淀粉(RDS)和抗性淀粉(RS)质量分数分别下降了30.15%和26.75%,慢消化淀粉(SDS)质量分数增加了26.59%,淀粉和蛋白质的消化率下降程度不同:淀粉水解20、50、80和120 min后消化率分别下降了30.15%、13.75%、7.06%和1.79%;胃蛋白酶处理的蛋白质消化率下降了8.27%,胃-胰蛋白酶处理的蛋白质消化率下降了4.91%,可溶性蛋白的提取率下降了34.29%。高温储藏对小麦淀粉和蛋白质的消化率影响显著(P<0.05)。 Effect of accelerated aging of 40 ℃ on nutritional quality of starch and protein in wheat grains has been studied in the present paper. The results indicated that rapidly digestible starch (RDS) and resistant starch (RS) declined by 30. 15% and 26.75% respectively, while the slowly digestible starch (SDS) increased by 26.59% during accelerated aging. Apparent decline to various extents in starch and protein digestibility could be also observed in accelerated aging. Starch digestibility was declined by 30.15% , 13.75% , 7.06% and 1.79% respec- tively after incubated with separated enzyme solution 20, 50, 80 and 120 min, while protein digestibility was declined by 8.27% and 4.91% after pepsin and pepsintrypsin digestion; the extractability of soluble proteins decreased by 34.29% during accelerated aging. Effect of accelerated aging on digestibility of wheat starch and protein was remarkable (P 〈 0.05 ).
出处 《中国粮油学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期11-14,共4页 Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association
基金 小麦产业技术体系建设(CARS-03)
关键词 小麦 储藏 淀粉 蛋白质 消化率 wheat, storage, starch, protein, digestibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Jenkins DJA, Thorne MJ, Camelon K, et al. Effect of processing on digestibility and the blood glucose response of lentils [J]. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1982, 36:1093–1101.
  • 2Englyst HN, Kingman SM, Cummings JH. Classification and measurement of nutritionally important starch fractions [J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1992, 46 (Suppl. 2):30–50.
  • 3Axelsen M, Arvidsson LR, Lonnroth P, et al. Breakfast glycaemic response in patients with type 2 diabetes: effects of bedtime dietary carbohydrates [J]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1999, 53:706-710.
  • 4Ells LJ, Seal CJ, Kettlitz B, et al. Postprandial glycaemic, lipaemic and haemostatic responses to ingestion of rapidly and slowly digested starches in healthy young women [J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2005, 94:948-955.
  • 5Seal CJ, Daly ME, Thomas LC, et al. Postprandial carbohydrate metabolism in healthy subjects and those with type 2 diabetes fed starches with slow and rapid hydrolysis rates determined in vitro [J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 2003, 90:853-864.
  • 6Nugent AP. Health properties of resistant starches [J]. Nutrition Bulletin, 2005, 30:27–54.
  • 7Morrell MK, Konik-Rose C, Ahmed R LZ, et al. Synthesis of resistant starches in plants [J]. Journal of AOAC International, 2004, 87:740–748.
  • 8Duodu KG, Taylor JRN, Belton PS, et al. Factors affecting sorghum protein digestibility [J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2003, 38:117–131.
  • 9Gopal DH, Monteiro PV, Virupaksha TK, et al. Protein concentrates from Italian millet (Setaria italica) and their enzymatic hydrolysis [J]. Food Chemistry, 1988, 29:97–108.
  • 10Osborne TB. The protein of wheat kernel [M]. Washington, 1907.

同被引文献88

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部