期刊文献+

技术哲学研究中的二元化问题探析 被引量:1

Dualization Problems in the Research of Technological Philosophy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 技术人工物的两重性问题、技术伦理的二元划分和技术-社会研究模式确立等二元化问题已然成为时下技术哲学研究的重要视点。结构-功能、结构-意向性的"二元组成"是从技术设计的视角来打开技术黑箱的必由之路;设计伦理和使用伦理的"二元分割",使得技术伦理研究包括动态嵌入和事后规范两个向度;技术-社会"二元依存"模型的建构,使得技术研究从脱域回归至返域的境遇中来。 Nowadays,the dual nature of technical artifacts,the dichotomy of technology ethics and the model's establish of technical-social have already become an important viewpoint of the philosophy of technology. " Dual composition" of Structure-Function and Structure-Intention is an important way for open black box of technology which from a perspective of technology design.The " binary segmentation" for design ethics and use ethics,making the technology ethics research including two dimensions:dynamic embedded and post-specification.The " binary dependencies" model construction of technical-social,make technology research turn from disembeding to integration.
作者 刘宝杰
出处 《长沙理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第1期32-35,共4页 Journal of Changsha University of Science and Technology:Social Science
基金 湖南省社科基金项目(13YBB005) 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目(13B133)
关键词 二元化问题 技术人工物的两重性 设计伦理 技术-社会模型 荷兰学派 dualization problem dual nature of technical artifacts design ethics technical-social model Dutch School
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Kroes Peter. Technical Artefacts: Creations of Mind and Matter A Philosophy of Engineering Design [M].Springer,2012.
  • 2Ridder J D. Reconstructing design,explaining artifacts: Philosophical reflections on the design and explanation of technical artifacts [D]. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2007.
  • 3潘恩荣.技术哲学的两种经验转向及其问题[J].哲学研究,2012(1):98-105. 被引量:28
  • 4Brey Philip. Philosophy of Technology after the Empir- ical Turn[J] . Techn6,2010,14(1).
  • 5Kroes Peter. Technological explanations: the relation between structure and function of technological objects [J]. Society for philosophy and technology, 1998 : 18-- 34.
  • 6Kroes Peter,Meijers Anthonie,eds. Philosophy of tech- nical artifacts[M]. Delft-- Eindhoven,2005.

二级参考文献14

  • 1克洛斯,2011年:《技术哲学:从外在进路到内在进路》,载潘恩荣《工程设计哲学--技术人工物的结构与功能之间的关系》,中国社会科学出版社.
  • 2Achterhuis, H. , 2001, American Philosophy of Technology: The Empirical Turn, Bloomington/Minneapolis: Indiana University Press.
  • 3Franssen, M. , G. Lokhorst and I. van de Poel, 2010, "Philosophy of technology", in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • 4Kroes, P. , 1998, "Technological explanations: the relation between structure and function of technologica! objects", in Society for Philosophy and Technology 3 (3) .
  • 5Kroes, P. ,2002, "Design methodology and the nature of technical artefacts", in Design Studies 23 (3) .
  • 6Koes, P. and Meijers, A. , 2000, "Introduction: a discipline in search of its identity", in The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology, Amsterdam: JAI Press, Elsevier Science Ltd.
  • 7Mitcham, C. , 1994, Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 8Pitt, J. C. , 1995, "On the philosophy of technology, past and future", in Society for Philosophy and Technology 1 ( 1 - 2 ) .
  • 9Pitt, J. C. ,1999, Thinking About Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology, New York: Seven Bridges Press.
  • 10Scheele, M. , 2005, The Proper Use of Artefacts. A Philosophical Theory of The Social Constitution of Artefact Functions, PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology.

共引文献27

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部