期刊文献+

CCL5基因rs2280788多态性与肺结核易感性关系的meta分析

Association between CCL5 gene rs2280788 polymorphism and tuberculosis susceptibility: a meta-analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨CCL5基因rs2280788多态性与肺结核病易感性关系。方法计算机检索数据库,收集有关CCL5基因rs2280788多态性与肺结核病易感性关系病例对照研究,提取纳入文献的相关数据进行meta分析,以病例组与对照组CCL5基因rs2280788位点各种基因模型的比值比(OR)为效应指标,漏斗图检测发表偏倚。结果共6篇研究符合纳入标准,累计病例数1364例,对照组1581例。meta分析表明CCL5基因rs2280788多态性与肺结核病易感性无明显关联性。纯合子比较模型(GGVSCC):OR=1.28,95%CI:0.47~3.47,P=0.62;杂合子比较模型(CGVSCC):OR=1.19,95%CI:0.82~1.72,P=0.36;显性遗传模型(CG+GGVSCC):OR=1.27,95%CI:0.81~1.99,P=0.29;隐性遗传模型(GGvsCC+GC):OR=1.21,95%CI:0.49~2.98,P=0.68。结论CCL5基因rs2280788多态性与肺结核病易感性无明显关联性。 Objective To explore the association between CCL5 gene rs2280788 polymorphism and tuberculosis susceptibility. Methods Data bases were comprehensively searched to retrace all the related studies on the association between CCL5 gene rs2280788 polymorphism and tuberculosis susceptibility. The pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI ) of the association between CCL5 gene rs2280788 polymorphism and tuberculosis susceptibility were performed in different genetic model comparison. The publication bias was detected by symmetry of funnel plot. Results Six original studies with a total of 2 945 subjects (1 364 patients and 1 581 controls) were entered the final data combination. The results of meta analysis showed that there was no significant association between CCL5 gene rs2280788 polymorphism and tuberculosis susceptibility in different genetic model comparison. GG vs CC: OR :1.28,95% CI :0.47--3.47, P =0.62;CG vs CC: OR =1.19,95% CI :0.82--1.72, P=0.36; CG-bGG vs CC: OR = 1.27,95% CI :0.81-- 1.99, P =0.29;GG vs CC+GC: OR = 1.21,95% CI : 0. 49 - 2. 98 , P = 0.68. Conclusions Meta analysis strongly suggests that there is no significant association between CCL5 gene rs2280788 polymorphism and tuberculosis susceptibility.
出处 《国际呼吸杂志》 2015年第2期95-99,共5页 International Journal of Respiration
关键词 CCL5 基因多态性 肺结核 易感性 META分析 CCL5 Polymorphism Tuberculosis Susceptibility Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1魏丽娟,董惠娟.Meta分析中异质性的识别与处理[J].第二军医大学学报,2006,27(4):449-450. 被引量:59
  • 2Zhong L, Goldberg MS, Parent ME, et al. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a Metaanalysis. Lung Cancer, 2000,27( 1 ) : 3-18.
  • 3Baujat B, Mahe C, Pignon JP, et al. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in Meta-analysis: application to a Metaanalysis of 65 trials. Star Med,2002,21(18) :2641-2652.
  • 4SchmidaCH,StarkaPC, Berlinb JA, et al. Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level,but not patient-level, factors. J Clin Epidemiol,2004, 57:683-697.
  • 5Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, et al. Opportunities and challenges for improving the quality of reporting clinical research: CONSORT and beyond. CMAJ, 2004,171 : 349-350.
  • 6张博恒,赵耐青.Meta分析中的统计方法.王吉耀.循证医学与临床实践.2版.北京:科学出版社,2002:89-117.
  • 7Sacks HS,Reitman D, Pagano D,et al. Meta-analysls: an update. Mount Sinai J Med, 1996,63 ( 3 -4) : 216-224.
  • 8Higgins J,Thompson S,Deeks J, et al. Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practice. J Health Serv Res Policy,2002,7(1) : 51- 61.
  • 9Hackshaw AK, Law MR,Wald NJ.The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. BMJ, 1997, 315: 980-988.
  • 10康德英,王家良,洪旗,刘关键.临床试验Meta分析中的异质性评价研究[J].华西医学,2000,15(2):143-145. 被引量:19

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部