期刊文献+

635nm激光致新西兰兔晶状体氧化损伤效应初步研究 被引量:3

Preliminary study on effects of oxidative damage to crystalline lens in New Zealand rabbits induced by 635 nm laser beam
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探索波长为635 nm的激光对新西兰兔眼晶状体的氧化损伤效应。方法 1在体激光暴露实验。健康雌性新西兰兔5只,随机取2只兔为空白对照组(4只眼),另3只兔的右眼为暴露组(3只眼),左眼为自身对照组(3只眼);暴露组兔眼以照射功率为20 m W的635 nm激光连续照射2 h/d,每周6 d,共60 d,2个对照组兔眼均不进行激光暴露;实验结束后分离各组晶状体进行透明度检查,采用酶标仪测定晶状体超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活力和丙二醛(MDA)、水溶性蛋白(WSF)、脲溶性蛋白(USF)的水平,计算WSF占总蛋白百分比(%)。2离体激光暴露实验。健康雌性新西兰兔4只,分离晶状体置于无菌M199培养基孵育后,以左眼为自身对照组(4只眼),右眼为暴露组(4只眼);暴露组晶状体以照射功率为20 m W的635 nm激光照射8 h/d,连续照射5 d;自身对照组晶状体不进行激光暴露。采用酶标仪测定晶状体SOD活力和MDA水平。结果在体激光暴露实验中,暴露组1只晶状体后囊部位出现轻微混浊,Geraldin分级为1级,其余各组晶状体均未发现浑浊现象,Geraldin分级为0级;暴露组、自身对照组和空白对照组3组晶状体的SOD活力和MDA水平分别比较,差异均无统计学意义[SOD:(1.803±0.542)vs(1.982±0.513)vs(1.247±0.235)mmol/(min·gprot),P>0.05;MDA:(0.078±0.017)vs(0.080±0.005)vs(0.077±0.006)μmol/gprot,P>0.05];3组晶状体WSF、USF的水平和WSF占总蛋白百分比分别比较,差异均无统计学意义[WSF:(113.31±14.70)vs(118.75±12.91)vs(114.05±14.41)g/L,P>0.05;USF:(3.23±0.22)vs(3.04±0.48)vs(2.52±0.50)g/L,P>0.05;WSF占总蛋白百分比:(97.33±0.30)%vs(97.39±0.25)%vs(97.79±0.70)%,P>0.05]。离体激光暴露实验中,暴露组晶状体SOD活力低于自身对照组[(0.144±0.004)vs(0.172±0.004)mmol/(min·gprot),P<0.05];2组晶状体MDA水平比较,差异无统计学意义[(0.031±0.002)vs(0.030±0.003)μmol/gprot,P>0.05]。结论 635 nm激光暴露可能会导致晶状体氧化损伤反应,具体机制有待进一步的研究。 Objective To explore the effects of oxidative damage in crystalline lens of New Zealand rabbits induced by 635 nm laser beam. Methods Female New Zealand rabbits were used in the present study, i) In vivo study. Five rabbits were used, 2 of them were randomly chosen as the blank control group (4 eyes) , on the other 3 rabbits, the right eyes (3 eyes) were regarded as the exposed group and left (3 eyes ) as the self-control group. The eyes in exposed group was directly exposed to 635 nm laser beam with irradiation power 20 mW, 2 hours a day for 60 continuous days. The eyes in control groups were treated like the exposed ones but without exposure to the laser beam. Crystalline lens was separated and their transparencies were detected. The levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), water solublefraction (WSF) and urea soluble fraction (USF) of crystalline lens were detected by microplate spectrophotometer, and the percentage level of WSF in total protein were calculated, ii) In vitro study. The crystalline lens excised from 4 rabbits were cultured in medium 199, the left crystalline lens regarded as the self-control group and the right ones as the exposed group. The crystalline lens in exposed group were exposed to 635 nm laser beam with irradiation power 20 mW, 8 hours a day for 5 continuous days while the control group was not exposed to laser beam. The levels of SOD and MDA were detected by microplate spectrophotometer. Results i) In vivo study. One crystalline lens in the exposed group displayed slightly opacification in posterior capsule, the Geraldin grade 1 was recorded, whereas crystalline lens in other groups still kept clear, with the Geraldin grade 0. No statistical significant differences of crystalline lens SOD activity and MDA level among the exposed, self-control and blank control groups were found respectively [ SOD : ( 1. 803± 0. 542 ) vs ( 1. 982 ± 0. 513 ) vs ( 1. 247± 0. 235 ) retool/( rain · gprot) ,P 〉 0. 05 ; MDA : (0. 078± 0. 017 ) vs (0. 080 ±0. 005 ) vs (0. 077± 0. 006 ) μmol/gprot, P 〉 0. 05 ] , while the same results were obtained in the levels of WSF, USF and the percentage levels of WSF in total protein respectively [ WSF: ( 113.31 ± 14.70) vs ( 118.75 ±12.91 ) vs ( 114.05 ±14.41 ) g/L, P 〉 0. 05 ; USF: (3.23±0. 22) vs ( 3.04±0. 48 ) vs ( 2. 52±0. 50) g/L, P 〉 0. 05 ; the percentage levels of WSF : ( 97. 33±0. 30 ) % vs (97. 39±0. 25)% vs (97. 79±0. 70)%, P 〉0. 051 . ii) In vitro study. Crystalline lens SOD level in exposure group was significantly lower than that in the self-control group [ ( 0. 144±0. 004 ) vs ( 0. 172± 0. 004 ) retool/( rain·gprot ), P 〈 0. 05 ], but there was no statistical difference in the MDA level between the two groups [ ( 0. 031± 0. 002 ) vs ( 0. 030±0. 003) μmol/gprot, P 〉 0. 051].Conclusion It is possible that the oxidative damage of lens could be induced by the 635nm laser beam, and the concrete mechanism is needed to be studied.
出处 《中国职业医学》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第6期627-631,638,共6页 China Occupational Medicine
基金 卫生公益性行业科研专项(201402021) 广东省医学科研基金(A2013057 B2014016) 广东省职业病防治重点实验室(2012A061400007)
关键词 635 nm激光 新西兰兔 晶状体 氧化损伤 超氧化物歧化酶 丙二醛 水溶性蛋白 脲溶性蛋白 635 nm Laser beam New Zealand rabbit Crystalline lens Oxidative damage Superoxide dismutase Malon-dialdehyde Water soluble fraction Urea soluble fraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献197

共引文献65

同被引文献25

  • 1刘海峰 张建 罗振坤.激光职业危害研究-激光对眼的影响.中华实用医药杂志,2005,5(15):1576-1578.
  • 2Bard S.Laser History,Physics,and Safety[J].Laser Treatm Vasc Les,2014,1:1-17.
  • 3Scollo P,Herath G,Lobo A.Retinal injury by industrial laser burn[J].Occup Med(Lond),2014,64(3):220-222.
  • 4D’Orazio JL.Work-related ocular injuries[J].Occup Emerg Med,2011:102-115.
  • 5Class H,Can L,Humans H.Laser beam safety scheme[J].Environ Care News,2015,18(2):7-9.
  • 6American National Standards Institute.ANSI Z 136.1-2014 Safe use of lasers[S].New York:Laser Institute of America,2014.
  • 7Sang A,Yang X,Chen H,et al.Upregulation of SYF2 relates to retinal ganglion cell apoptosis and retinal glia cell proliferation after light-induced retinal damage[J].J Mol Neurosci,2015,56(2):480-490.
  • 8Golu A,Gheorghisor I,Bˇalˇasoiu A T,et al.The effect of ultraviolet radiation on the cornea-experimental study[J].Rom J Morphol Embryol,2013,54(4):1115-1120.
  • 9Aly EM,Mohamed ES.Effect of infrared radiation on the lens[J].Indian J ophthalmol,2011,59(2):97-101.
  • 10Brown J,Hacker H,Schuschereba ST,et al.Steroidal and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications can improve photoreceptor survival after laser retinal photocoagulation[J].Ophthalmology,2007,114(10):1876-1883.

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部