期刊文献+

管理层薪酬激励与公司风险承担间的关系——基于动态内生性的经验研究 被引量:7

The Relationship Between Managerial Compensation Incentives and Corporate Risk-taking——Based on the Empirical Studies of Dynamic Endogeneity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以2002—2011年716家上市公司为样本,在动态内生性的框架下,运用动态面板的System GMM估计方法,以动态性视角研究了管理层薪酬激励与公司风险承担间的关系。研究发现:管理层薪酬激励与公司风险承担间存在动态内生性问题,不仅当期管理层薪酬激励对当期公司风险承担有显著的影响,而且前期管理层薪酬激励也对当期公司风险承担有显著的影响,并且两种薪酬激励方式对公司风险承担的影响方向相反。此外,前期公司风险承担对当期管理层薪酬有反馈效应。 In this paper, 716 listed companies range from 2002 to 2011 are used as our sample. In the framework of dynamic endogeneity, we use the dynamic System GMM model, based on a dynamic perspective to study the rela- tionship between managerial compensation incentives and corporate risk-taking. And we get the following results: There is dynamic endogeneity problem between managerial compensation and corporate risk-taking, not only current managerial compensation incentives has a significant effect on the corporate risk-taking, but also previous managerial compensation incentives has a significant effect on the corporate risk-taking, and two kinds of compensation incentives has a contrary effect on the corporate risk-taking. Besides, previous corporate risk-taking has a feedback effects on cur- rent managerial compensation.
作者 石大林
出处 《金融发展研究》 北大核心 2015年第1期17-25,共9页 Journal Of Financial Development Research
关键词 管理层持股比例 管理层货币薪酬 公司风险承担 动态内生性 managerial ownership, managerial monetary compensation, corporate risk-taking, dynamic endogeneity
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Acharya V V, Amihud Y, Litov L.2011.Creditor rights and corporate risk-taking[J].Journal of Financial Eco- nomics, 102(1).
  • 2Armstrong C S, Vashishtha R.2012.Executive stock options, differential risk-taking incentives, and firm value [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 104 ( 1 ).
  • 3Banker R D, Darrough M N, Huang R, et al.2012. The relation between ceo compensation and past perfor- mance[J]. The Accounting Review, 88 ( 1 ).
  • 4Bargeron L L, Lehn K M, Zutter C J.2010.Sar- banes-Oxley and corporate risk-taking[J]. Journal of Ac- counting and Economics, 49 ( 1 ).
  • 5Boubakri N, Cosset J C, Saffar W.2013.The role of state and foreign owners in corporate risk-taking: Evidence from privatization[J]. Journal of Financial Economics. -.
  • 6Chen Y R, Lee B S.2010.A dynamic analysis of ex- ecutive stock options: Determinants and consequences[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16 ( 1 ).
  • 7Flannery M J, Hankins K W.2012.Estimating dy- namic panel models in corporate finance[J]. Journal of Cor- porate Finance.
  • 8Hall B J, Murphy K J.2002.Stock options for undi- versified executives[J].Journal of accounting and econom- ics, 33 ( 1 ).
  • 9John K, Litov L, Yeung B.2008.Corporate Gover nance and Risk-Taking[J]. The Journal of Finance, 63 (4).
  • 10Mishra D R.2011.Multiple large shareholders and corporate risk taking: Evidence from East Asia[J].Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19 (6).

二级参考文献50

  • 1余明桂,夏新平,邹振松.管理者过度自信与企业激进负债行为[J].管理世界,2006,22(8):104-112. 被引量:410
  • 2周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007,42(7):36-50. 被引量:5681
  • 3林毅夫 蔡昉 李周.企业改革的核心是什么?[N].经济日报,1995-6-26(6).
  • 4樊纲,王小鲁,朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2010.
  • 5天则经济研究所课题组.国有企业的性质、表现与改革[R].2011.
  • 6青木昌彦,钱颖一.转轨经济中的公司治理结构-内部人控制和银行的作用[M].北京:中国经济出版社,1995:133.
  • 7Megginson, W.L., and J.M. Netter. From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization[J]. Journal of Economic Literature, 2001,39 (2).
  • 8Caves, D.W., and L.R. Christiansen. The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in a Competitive Environment: The Case of Canadian Railroad[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1980,88 (5).
  • 9Li, W. The Impact of Economic Reform on the Performance of Chinese State Enterprises: 1980--1989[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997,105 (5).
  • 10Shleifer, A., and R.W. Vishny. State versus Private Ownership[J]. Journal of Economic Perspective, 1995,12(4).

共引文献1066

同被引文献99

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部