期刊文献+

危险化学品泄漏事故应急防护行动优选 被引量:9

Optimization of emergency protective action for leakage accident from hazardous chemicals based on multi-criteria decision method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 危险化学品泄漏事故发生后,快速地优选应急防护行动对于保护公众的安全和健康是十分重要的。通常采取的应急防护行动有疏散、隐蔽和使用个人防护装备等。当决策者考虑多个属性如受影响区域人员的心理影响、应急防护行动的成本和预期挽救的人员数量时,最佳的应急防护行动并不是唯一的。提出了危险化学品泄漏事故应急防护行动优选的多属性决策方法,以确定最优的应急防护行动。案例研究表明,该方法能提高危险化学品泄漏事故应急决策的客观性。 Optimization of emergency protective actions quickly from hazardous chemicals release is very important for the protection of the public's safety and health. In this context, several protective actions can be performed, such as, evacuation, shelter-in-place and use of personal protective equipment. The best solution is not unique when multiple criteria are taken into consideration (e. g. physiological discomfort, emergency response cost, and the expected number of lives saved). This paper presents a multi-criteria decision method of emergency protective action in case of hazardous chemicals leakage accident to optimize the implemented protective action. Case study demonstrates that the proposed multi-criteria decision method can improve decision-making objectivity.
出处 《消防科学与技术》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第2期253-256,共4页 Fire Science and Technology
基金 武警学院科研项目"基于GIS的多灾耦合事故应急疏散决策优化"(KF201308)
关键词 多属性决策 应急防护行动 危险化学品 泄漏 multi-criteria decision emergency protective action optimization leakage of hazardous chemicals
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Levy J K,Taji K. Group decision support for hazards planning andemergency management: a Group Analytic Network Process(GANP) approach [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling,2007,46(7):906-917.
  • 2Narzisi G, Mysore V,Mishra B. Multi-objective evolutionary opti-mization of agent based models: an application to emergency re-sponse planning [ C]//Proceedings of the IASTED InternationalConference on Computational Intelligence, ACTA Press, 2006.
  • 3Paraskevi S Georgiadou, Ioannis A Papazoglou, Chris T Kiranou-dis,et al. Multi— objective evolutionary emergency response opti-mization for major accidents [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,178(1):792—803.
  • 4Sorensen J,Shumpert B,Vogt B. Planning for protective action de-cision making: evacuate or shelter-in-place [J]. Journal of Hazard-ous Materials, 2004,109(1) :1 —11.
  • 5李建华.灾害抢险救援技术[M].廊坊:中国人民武装警察部队学院,2005:9.
  • 6Mannan M S, Kilpatick D L. The pros and cons of shelter-in-place[J]. Process Safety Progress,2000,19(4) :210 —218.
  • 7辛晶,陈华,李向欣,王剑,武岱颖.有毒化学品泄漏事故应急防护行动决策探讨[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2012,8(2):93-96. 被引量:4
  • 8辛晶.基于区间层次分析法的核事故应急决策方案优选[J].辐射防护,2007,27(5):282-285. 被引量:17
  • 9辛晶.基于熵权TOPSIS法的城市消防站选址模型[J].消防科学与技术,2010,29(5):443-447. 被引量:12
  • 10Lean Yu, Kin Keung Lai. A distance-based group decision-makingmethodology for multi-person multi-criteria emergency decisionsupport[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011,51(2) :307 —315.

二级参考文献35

共引文献33

同被引文献54

引证文献9

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部