期刊文献+

“共同体”的分离与重建:当代医患关系的医学哲学思考 被引量:30

The Separation and Reconstruction of Community:Medical Philosophy Think of Contemporary Doctor-patient Relationship
下载PDF
导出
摘要 医患关系,就其本身来看,是利益共同体和精神共同体的有机结合。当代医患关系问题的实质是医患共同体走向分离。其根源在于,在我国医学事业发展过程中,医学背离了其固有的东西,而导致了医患共同体变得不可能。医学性质的改变导致医患利益共同体分离,医学人文精神的失落导致医患情感共同体的分离,医学德性的削弱导致医患道德共同体的分离,医学局限性的弱视导致医患生命共同体的分离。重建医患共同体的过程就是医学向其本身回归的过程,对医患共同体的重建需坚持"主体间性"的原则。 The relationship between doctors and patients, on its own, is the organic combination of the interests of the community and the spiritual community. The essence of the doctor-patient relationship is the separation of doctor patient community. The root is that, in the process of medical development in China, the medical deviate from its inherent things caused the doctor patient community impossible. It includes: weaken medical morality due to change of the separation of doctor patient community of interests, the loss of humanity spirit in medicine leads to the separation of doctor-patient emotional community, medical morality weaken cau- ses separation doctor-patient moral community, ignore the medical limitations. Process reconstruction of doctor patient community is to return to their own medicine, reconstruction of doctor patient community need to ad- here to the principle of "intersubjectivity".
作者 潘新丽
出处 《华中科技大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期109-113,共5页 Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金项目(08CZX031) 天津市教育科学"十二五"规划课题(CEX114009)
关键词 医患关系 共同体 医学哲学 community medical philosophy doctor patient relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献42

  • 1刘沛林.论中国历史文化村落的“精神空间”[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1996,33(1):51-55. 被引量:45
  • 2李醒民.科学和技术异同论[J].自然辩证法通讯,2007,29(1):1-9. 被引量:34
  • 3罗伊·波特.剑桥医学史[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2000.11.
  • 4Caldin E F. The Power and Limit of Science[M]. London:Chapman -- Hall LTD, 1949: chapter.
  • 5邱仁宗.《生命伦理学》[M].上海人民出版社,1987年5月版.第88-89页.
  • 6Anderson, A.: 1996, "Commercialization of Genentic Testing," Euroscreen, no.5, Spring p.1-7.
  • 7Bake, R.: 1998a, "A Theory of International Bioethics: Multicutualism, Postmodernism, and the Bankruptcy of Fundamentalism", Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8:201-231.
  • 8Baker, R.: 1998b, "Negotiating International Bioethics: A Response to Tom Beauchamp and Ruth Mackli", Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8:423-454.
  • 9Beauchamp, T. : 1998, "The Mettle of Moral Fundamentalism: A Reply to Robert Baker", Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 8:389-402.
  • 10Callahan, D.: 1995, "Bioethics, in Reich", W. T. (ed.): 1995, Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Revised edition, New York: Macmillan pp.247-256.

共引文献189

同被引文献354

引证文献30

二级引证文献192

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部