《学衡》与近代墨学研究

Xue Heng and Modern Mohism Studies

20世纪二三十年代关于墨学的大讨论中,《学衡》刊登了多篇文章,总结了清代墨学的校勘整理情况,并对荀孟辟墨、西学墨源、《墨子》一书成于谁手等观点作了考辨。对某些问题,学衡派内部的意见并不一致,但他们在墨学研究中常将儒墨比对而列,并体现出"儒学为优"的态度,反映了保守主义的文化立场。

In the 1920s-1930 s, Xue Heng published many papers discussing Mohism and summarizing the collation work about Mohism in the Qing dynasty. It also conducted research on why Xun Zi and Mencius disagreed with Mohism, how Mohism was transmitted to the Western world, and who was the writer of Mo Zi. On certain issues, scholars within the Xue Heng school often argued with each other; however, the commonality shared by them was the comparison of Mohism with Confucianism, and their priority was always given to Confucianism. This somewhat reflected a conservative cultural position.