期刊文献+

激活的断裂、合作的结果相依性与团队学习行为 被引量:2

Active Faultline,Cooperative Outcome Ineterdependence and Team Learning Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从断裂激活的视角出发,以断裂理论和社会相依性理论为基础,提出了激活的断裂和合作的结果相依性影响团队学习行为和团队创新的概念模型,并利用68个有效的团队样本进行了实证检验。研究发现:激活的断裂直接对团队效率产生负向作用,团队学习行为在激活的断裂对团队创新的负向作用中起部分中介作用;合作的结果相依性对激活的断裂与团队学习行为和团队创新之间的关系具有负向调节效应。 2.The Key Lab of the Ministry of Education for Process Control and Efficiency Engineering,Xi′an 710049,China) Abstract In consideration of the shortcomings of the objective research methods about faultline,this paper,from the perspective of faultline activation,proposes the conceptual framework bases on social dependency theory to explain how active faultline and cooperative outcome interdependence impact team learning behavior and team performance.68 valid team samples are adopted in the empirical analysis.The results reveal direct negative effect of active faultline on team ef-ficiency and indirect negative effect of active faultline on team innovation through team learning behavior.And this paper also discovers and confirms the negative moderating effects of cooperative outcome interdependence on the effects of ac-tive faultline on team learning behavior and team performance.
出处 《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期48-53,共6页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
基金 教育部人文社会科学基金项目(11YJA630069)
关键词 激活的断裂 合作结果相依性 团队学习行为 团队创新 团队效率 Active faultline Cooperative outcome interdependence Team learning behavior Team innovation Team ef-ficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1RICO R, MOLLEMAN E, SXNCHEZ - MANZANARES M, et al. The effects of diversity faultlines and team task autonomy on decision quality and social integration [ J ]. Journal of Management ,2007,33 ( 1 ) : 111 - 132.
  • 2THATCHER S M, JEHN K A, ZANUqTO E. Cracks in di- versity research:the effects of diversity fauhlines on conflict and performance [ J ]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2003,12(3) :217 - 241.
  • 3BEZRUKOVA K, JEHN K A, ZANUTI'O E L, et al. Do workgroup fauhlines help or hurt? A moderated model of fauhlines, team identification, and group performance [ J ]. Organization Science ,2009,20( 1 ) :35 - 50.
  • 4HOGG M A, ABRAMS D, OTFEN S, et al. The social identi- ty perspective intergroup relations, self - conception, and small groups[ J]. Small Group Research ,2004,35 ( 3 ) :246 - 276.
  • 5JACKSON S E,JOSHI A. Work team diversity [ M ]//ZE- DECK S. APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Washington, DC : American Psychological Asso- ciation ,2011:651 - 686.
  • 6POLZER J T, CRISP C B,JARVENPAA S L,et al. Exten- ding the fauhline model to geographically dispersed teams: how colocated subgroups can impair group functioning [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(4) :679-692.
  • 7WAGEMAN R. Interdependence and group effectiveness [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995,40 ( 1 ) : 145 - 180.
  • 8BREWER M B. In- group bias in the minimal intergroup situation : a cognitive - motivational analysis [ J ]. Psychologi- cal Bulletin, 1979,86 (2) : 307 - 324.
  • 9ABRAMS D,WETHERELL M, COCHRANE S,et al. Know- ing what to think by knowing who you are:self - categoriza- tion and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization[ J ]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 1990, 29(2) :97 - 119.
  • 10LAU D C, MURNIGHAN J K. Demographic diversity and fanltlines: the compositional dynamics of organizational groups [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1998,23 (2) :325 -340.

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部