期刊文献+

能源偏向型技术进步与绿色增长转型——基于中国33个行业的实证考察 被引量:56

Energy Biased Technology Progress and Green Growth Transformation——An Empirical Analysis Based on 33 Industries of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 推动中国经济实现绿色增长转型需要依赖技术进步。本文通过构建基于超越对数成本函数与Kalman Filter的测度模型,测算了中国33个行业的能源偏向型技术进步,并对行业能源偏向型技术进步动态演进特征与影响因素进行了评估。研究发现:总体上,行业技术进步偏向于能源消耗,高能耗特征明显。市场化滞后、资本密集型的行业受到市场规模效应影响而呈现出能源消耗型技术进步:技术与设备轻型化行业受能源价格影响,表现为能源节约型技术进步。技术创新特性与投资周期差异导致能源偏向型技术进步表现出较为明显的行业异质性特征,相比重工业,服务业和轻工业的波动次数更多、波幅相对较小。与发达国家相比,宏观环境波动和要素价格扭曲等非市场化因素导致中国行业技术进步偏向性较大、波动更频繁。保持宏观环境、行业政策的相对稳定,对于稳定企业预期、推动绿色技术创新具有重要意义。 Promoting the Chinese economy to achieve green growth transformation needs to rely on technological progress. This paper calculates the energy biased technology progress of 33 industries through constructing the measure model based on logarithmic cost function and Kalman Filter as well as evaluate dynamic evolution characteristics and influence factors of those energy biased technology progress. It finds that industry technology progress prefers to use more energy, which shows obvious high energy consumption characteristic. Capital intensive industries that lagging of marketing degree are more easily affected by the market scale effect and show energy consumption technology progress, industries that have light technology and equipment are more easily affected by energy price effect and show energy saving technology progress. Energy biased technology progress represents significant industry heterogeneity as a result of the characteristic of technological innovation and difference in investment cycle. Service industries and light industries have more frequent fluctuate and smaller amplitude than those of heave industries. The bias of industry technology progress of China show larger and more frequent fluctuation compared with developed countries as a result of the fluctuation of macro environment and the distorted price and other non-marketing factors. It is important that maintaining the relative stability of macroeconomic environment and industry policy and promoting market oriented reform so as to stabilize the company's expectation and promote green technology innovation.
出处 《中国工业经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期50-62,共13页 China Industrial Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金地区项目"能源偏向型技术进步与经济增长转型:理论机制及经验证据"(批准号71463022) 国家社会科学基金一般项目"转售价格维持(RPM)反垄断治理问题研究"(批准号14BFXZ096) 中国博士后科学基金项目"能源偏向型技术进步与经济增长转型:理论及实证"(批准号2014M560535)
关键词 要素价格 能源偏向型技术进步 绿色增长转型 状态空间模型 factor price energy biased technology progress green growth transformation state space model
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1杨继生,徐娟,吴相俊.经济增长与环境和社会健康成本[J].经济研究,2013,48(12):17-29. 被引量:123
  • 2David,P. A., and van de Klundert, T. Biased Efficiency Growth and Capital-Labor Substitution in the U.S.,1899—1960[J]. American Economic Review, 1965,55(3) :357-394.
  • 3Klump,R.,Me Adam, P.,and Willman, A. Unwrapping Some Euro Area Growth Puzzles ; Factor Substitution,Productivity and Unemployment[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2008,30(2) :645-666.
  • 4Sato, R., and Morita, T. Quantity Or Quality : The Impact of Labour Saving Innovation on US and JapaneseGrowth Rates, 1960—2004[J]. Japanese Economic Review, 2009,60(4) :407-434.
  • 5宋冬林,王林辉,董直庆.技能偏向型技术进步存在吗?——来自中国的经验证据[J].经济研究,2010,45(5):68-81. 被引量:246
  • 6戴天仕,徐现祥.中国的技术进步方向[J].世界经济,2010,33(11):54-70. 被引量:300
  • 7Sanstad,A. H.,Roy J.,and Sathaye, J.A. Estimating Energy-augmenting Technological Change in DevelopingCountry Industries[J]. Energy Economics, 2006,28(5) ;720-729.
  • 80tto,V. M.,Loschel, A., and Dellink,R. Energy Biased Technical Change: A CGE Analysis [J]. Resourceand Energy Economics, 2007,29(2) : 137-158.
  • 9Karanfil,Fatih, and Yeddir-Tamsamani, Yasser. Is technological Change Biased toward Energy? A Multi -sectoral Analysis for the French EconomyfJ]. Energy Policy, 2010,38(4) : 1842-1850.
  • 10Hui,Jin, and Jorgenson, D.W. Econometric Modeling of Technical Change [J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2010,157(2):205-219.

二级参考文献227

共引文献1394

同被引文献847

引证文献56

二级引证文献608

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部