期刊文献+

细胞色素P450 2C19基因多态性与急性冠脉综合征患者PCI治疗后血小板再活化及预后的关系 被引量:6

Effects of cytochrome P450 2C19 genetic polymorphism on high post-treatment platelet reactivity and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨细胞色素P450 2C19(CYP2C19)基因多态性与接受经皮冠状动脉腔内介入(percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI)治疗的急性冠脉综合征(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)患者术后血小板再活化(posttreatment platelet reactivity,HPPR)的关系及对其临床预后的影响。方法选择2011年1月至2012年6月在广州市第一人民医院心内科住院,诊断为ACS并接受PCI治疗的患者362例。于PCI治疗后测定5μmol/L腺苷二磷酸(ADP)诱导的血小板聚集率(platelet aggregation ratio,PAR),以受试者工作曲线(ROC曲线)确定预测患者术后主要心血管事件(major adverse coronary event,MACE)发生的最佳PAR值(44.5%)后将患者分为HPPR组(PAR≥44.5%)和对照组(PAR<44.5%)。应用聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性技术(PCR-RFLP)检测患者CYP2C19基因681(G/A)位点的基因型和等位基因,观察两组患者CYP2C19(681G/A)基因型、等位基因分布情况及住院期间与术后6个月随访期内MACE的发生情况。结果 HPPR组CYP2C19(681AA)基因型及携带681A等位基因频率均显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(25.9%vs.10.4%,P<0.01;48.7%vs.24.0%,P<0.01)。HPPR组明确的支架血栓事件及随访期间MACE的发生率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(5.3%vs.0.8%,χ2=7.433,P=0.012;14.3%vs.7.2%,χ2=4.563,P=0.047)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示携带CYP2C19(681A)基因、HPPR均是ACS患者PCI治疗后MACE发生的独立预测因子(P<0.05)。结论 ACS患者CYP2C19基因681(G/A)位点单核苷酸多态性与PCI治疗后HPPR存在相关性;ACS患者CYP2C19基因的突变导致患者对抗血小板治疗的低反应性,并增加患者PCI治疗后血栓事件和MACE发生的风险。 Objectives To investigate the relationship between cytochrome P450 2C19(CYP2C19) genetic polymorphism and high post-treatment platelet reactivity(HPPR) in patients with acute coronary syndrome(ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI),and to assess the effect of CYP2C19 genetic polymorphism on the prognosis of patients with ACS. Methods Totally 362 patients with ACS undergoing PCI from January 2011 to June 2012 in The First People 's Hospital of Guangzhou were enrolled. The 5 μmol / L adenosine diphosphate(ADP)-induced platelet aggregation ratio(PAR) were measured 12-24 hours after PCI. Patients were divided into control group(PAR 44.5%) and HPRR group(PAR≥44.5%) according to the optimal value of PAR(44.5%,confirmed by receiver-operating characteristic curve) for predicting major adverse cardiac events(MACE). Genomic DNA of patients were extracted from whole blood samples and polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism(PCR-RFLP) method was used to genotype the single nucleotide polymorphism of CYP2C19 681 G / A. After PCI,patients were followed up for 6 months and MACE(including stent thrombosis events) during the period were recorded. Results The frequencies of CYP2C19 and genotype CYP2C19 681 AA in HPPR group were significantly higher than those in control group(25.9% vs. 10.4%,P〈0.01; 48.7% vs. 24.0%,P〈0.01). Incidence rates of stent thrombosis and MACE during follow-up in HPPR group were also significantly higher than those in control group(5.3% vs. 0.8%,χ^2=7.433,P=0.012; 14.3% vs. 7.2%,χ^2=4.563,P =0.047). Binary Logistic regression analysis indicated that both gene CYP2C19 681 A and HPPR were strong independent predictors for MACE in patients with ACS after PCI(P〈0.05). Conclusions Genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19 is associated with HPPR in patients with ACS undergoing PCI. Mutation of CYP2C19 induces the hypoergia to antiplatelet therapy and increases the risk of stent thrombosis and MACE in patients with ACS after PCI.
出处 《岭南心血管病杂志》 2015年第1期32-36,共5页 South China Journal of Cardiovascular Diseases
基金 广东省科技计划项目(项目编号:2011B031800113)
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 细胞色素P450 多态性 单核苷酸 血小板反应性 预后 coronary artery disease CYP2C19 polymorphism mononucleotide platelet reactivity prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1KOLH P, WIJNS W, DANCHIN N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization[J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010, 38 (Suppl): S1-$52.
  • 2CUISSET T, FRERE C, QUILICI J, et al. High post-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with a high incidence of myonecrosis after stenting for Non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2007, 97(2): 282-287.
  • 3柯元南,陈纪林.不稳定性心绞痛和非ST段抬高心肌梗死诊断与治疗指南[J].中华心血管病杂志,2007,35(4):295-304. 被引量:2143
  • 4MAURI L, HSIEH W H, MASSARO J M, et al. Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents [J]. N Engl J Med, 2007, 356(10) : 1020-1029.
  • 5OPAR S P, SHORT M W, JORGENSEN J E, et al. Acute coronary syndrome and cardiac arrest: using simulation to assess resident performance and program outcomes [ J ]. J Grad Med Educ, 2010, 2(3): 404-409.
  • 6SEREBRUUANY V L, STEINHUBL S R, BERGER P B, et al. Variability in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel among 544 individuals [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2005, 45 (2): 246- 251.
  • 7ANGIOLILLO D J, ALFONSO F. Platelet function testing and cardiovascular outcomes: steps forward in identifying the best predictive measure[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2007, 98(4): 707- 709.
  • 8SIBBING D, BRAUN S, MORATH T, et al. Platelet reactivity after clopidogrel treatment assessed with point-of-care analysis and early drug-eluting stent thrombosis [ J ]. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2009, 53(10): 849-856.
  • 9SIMON T, VERSTUYFT C, MARY-KRAUSE M, et al. French Registry of Acute ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial infarction (FAST-MI) Investigators. Genetic determinants of response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular events[J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(4) : 363-375.
  • 10MEGA J L, CLOSE S L, WIVIOTr S D, et al. Cytochrome p- 450 polymorphism and response to clopidogrel [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 360(4): 354-362.

二级参考文献24

  • 1李小鹰.阿司匹林在动脉硬化性心血管疾病中的临床应用:中国专家共识(2005)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2006,34(3):281-284. 被引量:194
  • 2Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction-summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines(Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). J Am Coll Cardiol,2002, 40(7) :1366-1374.
  • 3Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KA, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J,2002,23 ( 23 ) : 1809 -1840.
  • 4Erhardt L, Herlitz J, Bossaert L, et al. Task force on the management of chest pain. Eur Heart J, 2002, 23 ( 15 ) : 1153-1176.
  • 5CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet, 1996, 348(9038) :1329-1339.
  • 6Yusuf S, Zhao F, Mehta SR, et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med, 2001 , 345 ( 7 ) :494-502.
  • 7Mehta SR, Yusuf S, Peters RJ, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study. Lancet, 2001, 358(9281):527-533.
  • 8Simoons ML, GUSTO IV-ACS Investigators. Effect of glycopmtein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor blocker abciximab on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes without early coronary revascularisation:the GUSTO IV-ACS randomised trial. Lancet, 2001,357(9272) :1915-1924.
  • 9Platlat Receptor Inhibitor in Ischemic Syndrome Management(PRISM) study investigator. A comparison of aspirin plus tirofiban with aspirin plus heparin for unstable angina. Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management ( PRISM )Study Investigators. N Engl J Med, 1998, 338(21 ) :1498-1505.
  • 10Platlat Receptor Inhibitor in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms(PRISM-PLUS) study investigator. Inhibition of the platelet giycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa receptor with tirofiban in unstable angina and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) Study Investigators. N Engl J Med,1998, 338(21) :1488-1497.

共引文献2142

同被引文献38

引证文献6

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部