期刊文献+

Sensitivity of digital elevation models:The scenario from two tropical mountain river basins of the Western Ghats,India 被引量:1

Sensitivity of digital elevation models:The scenario from two tropical mountain river basins of the Western Ghats,India
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The paper evaluates sensitivity of various spaceborne digital elevation models (DEMs), viz., Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER), Shuttle Radar Topography Mapping Mission (SRTM) and Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED), in comparison with the DEM (TOPO) derived from contour data of 20 m interval of Survey of India topographic sheets of 1 : 50,000 scale. Several topographic attributes, such as elevation (above mean sea level), relative relief, slope, aspect, curvature, slope-length and -steepness (LS) factor, terrain ruggedness index (TRI), topo- graphic wetness index (TWI), hypsometric integral (lhyp) and drainage network attributes (stream number and stream length) of two tropical mountain river basins, viz. Muthirapuzha River Basin and Pambar River Basin are compared to evaluate the variations. Though the basins are comparable in extent, they differ in respect of terrain characteristics and climate. The result.,; suggest that ASTER and SRTM provide equally reliable representation of topography portrayed by TOP() and the topographic attributes extracted from the spaceborne DEMs are in agreement with those derived from TOPO. Despite the coarser resolution, SRTM shows relatively higher vertical accuracy (RMSE -- 23 and 20 m respectively in MRB and PRB) compared to ASTER (RMSE - 33 and 24 m) and GMTED (RMSE - 59 and 48 m). Vertical accuracy of all the spaceborne DEMs is influenced by relief of the terrain as well as type of vegetation. Further, GMTED shows significant deviation for most of the attributes, indicating its inability for mountain-river-basin-scale studies. The paper evaluates sensitivity of various spaceborne digital elevation models (DEMs), viz., Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER), Shuttle Radar Topography Mapping Mission (SRTM) and Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 (GMTED), in comparison with the DEM (TOPO) derived from contour data of 20 m interval of Survey of India topographic sheets of 1 : 50,000 scale. Several topographic attributes, such as elevation (above mean sea level), relative relief, slope, aspect, curvature, slope-length and -steepness (LS) factor, terrain ruggedness index (TRI), topo- graphic wetness index (TWI), hypsometric integral (lhyp) and drainage network attributes (stream number and stream length) of two tropical mountain river basins, viz. Muthirapuzha River Basin and Pambar River Basin are compared to evaluate the variations. Though the basins are comparable in extent, they differ in respect of terrain characteristics and climate. The result.,; suggest that ASTER and SRTM provide equally reliable representation of topography portrayed by TOP() and the topographic attributes extracted from the spaceborne DEMs are in agreement with those derived from TOPO. Despite the coarser resolution, SRTM shows relatively higher vertical accuracy (RMSE -- 23 and 20 m respectively in MRB and PRB) compared to ASTER (RMSE - 33 and 24 m) and GMTED (RMSE - 59 and 48 m). Vertical accuracy of all the spaceborne DEMs is influenced by relief of the terrain as well as type of vegetation. Further, GMTED shows significant deviation for most of the attributes, indicating its inability for mountain-river-basin-scale studies.
出处 《Geoscience Frontiers》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2014年第6期893-909,共17页 地学前缘(英文版)
基金 Financial support from Kerala State Council for Science,Technology,and Environment,Thiruvananthapuram and permission for the field studies in the protected areas by Kerala Forest Department
关键词 DEM ASTER SRTM GMTEDTropical mountain river basins Western Ghats DEM ASTER SRTM GMTEDTropical mountain river basins Western Ghats
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1ESRI, 1997. Watershed Delineator Application: User's Manual. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA.
  • 2Giusti E V, Schneider W J, 1965. The distribution of branches in river networks. USGS Professional Paper, 422G.
  • 3Gregory K J, 1966. Dry valley and the composition of the drainage net. Journal of Hydrology, 4: 327-340.
  • 4Hack J T, 1957. Studies of longitudinal stream profiles in Virginia and Maryland. USGS Professional Paper,294B.
  • 5Horton R E, 1932. Drainage basin characteristics. Transactions of American Geophysics Union, 13: 350-361.
  • 6Horton R E, 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56(3): 275-370.
  • 7Manu M S, Anirudhan S, 2008. Drainage characteristics of Achankovil River Basin, Kerala. Journal of Geological Society of lndia, 71: 841-850.
  • 8Melton M A, 1965. The geomorphic and paleoclimatic significance of alluvial deposits in Southern Arizona. Journal of Geology, 73: 1-38.
  • 9Miller, V.C., 1953. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Technical Report 3, Office of Naval Research, Department of Geology, Columbia University, New York.
  • 10Schumm, S.A., 1956. Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67: 597-646.

共引文献9

同被引文献45

引证文献1

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部