民事裁判共识的博弈构建

Game Construction on Civil Adjudication Consensus

民事裁判不是裁判者单方的意志体现,而是在裁判法官与诉讼当事人之间建立有效的对话沟通机制并依法作出处理的过程。这种对话沟通机制是以双方当事人之间、当事人与法院之间的对话博弈为主要内容,通过当事人双方和法院构成的共同体来协商运作,最终达成各参与主体都愿意接受的共识。这种裁判共识机制不仅需要建立对话与讨论的公共平台,还需要综合考虑法律、事实和社会三个方面的因素,构建一种合理而公正的程序机制,找到各方都能接受的纳什均衡点,尽可能实现各方的利益最大化。民事裁判共识的实现不仅要得到诉讼主体的共同认可,还要得到社会公众的认同。

Civil adjudication is not unilateral will of judgment,but a process by setting up effective communication mechanism between the parties and court. This kind of dialogue and communication mechanism is use a dialogue game between parties and the court,with both parties as its main content,by the community consisting of the parties and the court to negotiate operation,reach a consensus that participants are willing to accept. This ruling consensus mechanism not only need to establish public platform of dialogue and discussion,also need give overall consideration to three factors of law,facts and social to establish a reasonable and justice procedure mechanism,find the Nash equilibrium point that all parties would all accept,to maximize the interests of all parties as soon as possible. The realization of civil ruling consensus not noly require mutual recognition of litigation subject,but also get recognition of the public.