期刊文献+

教育政策论证的价值研究

Research on the Value of Education Policy Argumentation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教育政策论证对于教育政策的实际运行具有重要的作用,但其相关理论研究十分缺乏,现有的研究集中于论证模式及论证步骤的讨论,还涉及教育政策事实分析中的论证理论和教育政策价值分析中的论证理论。政策论证的过程是多方面利益博弈的过程,其发挥作用的途径是通过某一政策的相关利益团体积极参与,各团体利用一切资源在利益博弈中达到政策最佳平衡点,减少政策实施的阻力,以最小成本获取最佳效果。教育政策论证的价值体现在:政策制定阶段保证其合法性,执行阶段保证工具选择的科学性,教育政策评估阶段促进实证性评估与规范性评估的统一。 Education policy argumentation plays an important role in the operation of policies, but there is still not e- nough theoretical research on it. Researches available now have focused on the discussion of argumentation model and pro- cedures, but haven' t been concerned with the argumentation theories in the analysis of education policy facts and education policy value. The essence of policy argumentation is a game of various interests, and it plays its role through the following channels: relevant interest groups of some policy take an active participation, different groups make use of all resources to reach the point of best balance in the game of interests, and to reduce the resistance of policy implementation to obtain the best effect with the smallest cost. The value of education policy argumentation is embodied in the insurance of its legitimacy in the period of policy formulation, the scitificalness of tool selection in the period of implementation and the unification of empirical evaluation and standard evaluation in the period of education policy evaluation.
出处 《教育理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期15-18,共4页 Theory and Practice of Education
关键词 教育政策 教育政策论证 团体模式 education policy education policy argumentation group model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1周超,易洪涛.政策论证中的共识构建:实践逻辑与方法论工具[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2007,60(6):913-920. 被引量:11
  • 2[美]威廉_N.邓恩.公共政策分析导论(第四版)[M].谢明等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011.13.14.
  • 3[美]托马斯_R.戴伊.理解公共政策(第十版)[M].彭勃等译.北京:华夏出版社,2005.110.
  • 4[美]保罗.萨巴蒂尔,汉克.(:.詹金斯-史密斯.政策变迁与学习:一种倡议联盟途径[M].邓征译.北京:北京大学出版社,2011.20.
  • 5[美]詹姆斯_E.安德森.公共政策制定(第五版)[M].谢明,等,译.北京:中国人民大学,2009:96-97.
  • 6庾向荣小升初推优”政策涉嫌违法[EB/OL].检察日报,2009-04-22[2014-04-20].http://www.jyb.cn/opinion/jcjy/200904/t20090422_266567.html.
  • 7Lester . M *Salamon.Tools of Govemment:A Guide to the NewGovernance[ M).Oxford,New York:0xford University Press,2002.
  • 8迈克尔.豪利特,M.拉米什.公共政策研究:政策循环与政策子系统[M].庞诗,译.北京:生活.读书.新知三联书店,2006:280 - 282.
  • 9审计署.农村中小学撤并致辍学人数翻倍[EB/0L].京华时报(北京),2013-05-04[2014-04-20].http://kids.l63.com/l3/0504/09/8U1869PH00294KTV.html.
  • 10国务院.因生源少撤并学校必须听取家长意见[EB/OL].国际在线(北京),2012-08-30[2014-04-20].http://kias.l63.com/12/0830/1 l/8A5CN7ES00294KTV.html#from=relevant#xwwzy_35 一bottomnewskwd.

二级参考文献16

  • 1周超.当代西方政策科学方法论的范式转向[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,58(4):529-534. 被引量:14
  • 2deLeon, Peter. Advice and Consent: The Development of the Policy Sciences [M]. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1988.
  • 3Majone, G. Evidence. Augument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process[M]. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1989.
  • 4Payne, Thomas. The Role of Consensus[J]. The Western Political Quarterly, 1965, 18(3).
  • 5Pressman, J. & A. Wildavsky. Implementation[M]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.
  • 6Innes, J. & D. E. Booher. Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems: A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning[J]. Journal of American Planning Association, 1999,65 (4).
  • 7Hikins, J. A. Through the Rhetorical Looking-glass: Consensus Theory and Fairy Tales in the Epistemology of Communication[J]. Communication Studies, 1989, 40.
  • 8Coglianese, C. The Llimits of Consensus. The Environmental Protection System in Transition: Toward Amore Desirable Future[J]. Environment, 1999, 41.
  • 9Gregory, R. , et al. Decision Aiding, Not Dispute Resolution: Creating Insights through Structured Environmental Decisions[J]. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2001, 20.
  • 10Toulmin, S. The Uses of Argument[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.

共引文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部