期刊文献+

机器人与腹腔镜行右侧结肠切除术比较的Meta分析 被引量:8

A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价机器人与腹腔镜手术治疗右侧结肠外科疾病的临床效果。方法计算机检索Pub Med、Cochrane Library、Medline、Embase等数据库,同时根据以上检索所得文献的参考文献进行扩大检索。采用Cochrane协作网提供的Rev Man5.2.7统计软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入7项符合标准的研究,共计649例患者。结果显示,机器人右结肠切除组(RRC)与腹腔镜右结肠切除组(LRC)相比,在中转开腹率、吻合口瘘发生率、术后肠梗阻发生率以及住院时间方面差异无显著性。而RRC组在减少术后总体并发症的发生以及术中出血量方面优于LRC组的,差异具有显著性。此外,LRC组的手术花费时间少于RRC组,差异具有显著性。结论通过本次Meta分析发现,RRC组与LRC组相比,其安全性及有效性更优。 Objective To evaluate clinical effects of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy of colonic diseases. Method Relevant literature was retrieved from databases including Pub Med,Cochrane Library,Medline and Embase. Exploding search was done with references of retrieved articles. The Review Manager software( Version 5. 2. 7) was used for statistical analyses. Result A total of seven studies met the criteria,including 649 cases of patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in conversion rates to open surgery,anastomosis leakage,postoperative ileus and length of hospital stay. RRC is better than LRC in reducing overall complications and estimated blood loss. Moreover,LRC costs less time during operation. Conclusion The results of this meta-analysis suggest that RRC is safer and more efficient than LRC.
出处 《中国临床医生杂志》 2015年第1期21-25,共5页 Chinese Journal For Clinicians
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81172020 81372262)
关键词 机器人 腹腔镜 右侧结肠切除术 META分析 Robot Colectomy Laparoscopic Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Shabbir A, Roslani AC, Wong KS, et al. Is laparoscopic colectomy as cost beneficial as open colectomy [ Jl. ANZ J Surg, 2009,79 (4) :265-270.
  • 2Fleshman J, Sargent D J, Green E, et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial[ J]. Ann Surg, 2007,246 (4) :655-662.
  • 3Romano G, Gagliardi G, Bianco F, et al. Laparoscopic coloreetal surgery: why it is still not the gold standard and why it should be [J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2008,12(2) :185-188.
  • 4Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA, et al. Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgi- cal system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy : a systematic review and meta-analysis[ J]. Ann Surg, 2010,252(2) : 254 -262.
  • 5Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. Robot-assisted laparo- scopic pancreatic surgery : single-surgeon experience [ J ]. Surg En- dose, 2010,24(7) :1646-1657.
  • 6Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A, et al. Telerobotic-assisted laparoseopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease [ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2002,45 ( 12 ) : 1689-1694.
  • 7Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Molaro R, et al. Robotic-assisted intracor- poreal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer: a case control study [ J 1. J Laparo- endosc Adv Surz Tech A, 2013.23 (5) :414-417.
  • 8Casillas MA Jr, Leichtle SW, Wahl WL, et al. Improved periopera- tire and short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparo- scopic colorectal operations[ J ]. Am J Surg, 2014,208 ( 1 ) :33-40.
  • 9deSouza AL, Prasad LM, Park J J, et al. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role [ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2010,53 (7) :1000-1006.
  • 10Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V, et al. Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience [ J ]. Snrg Endosc, 2012,26(4) :956-963.

二级参考文献20

  • 1直肠癌规范化诊疗指南(试行)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(7):56-61. 被引量:36
  • 2无.结肠癌规范化诊疗指南(试行)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2013,5(8):50-55. 被引量:79
  • 3岳亮,梁小波.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的研究进展[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(5):76-80. 被引量:8
  • 4李国新,丁自海,张策,黄祥成,钟世镇.腹腔镜下左半结肠切除术相关筋膜平面的解剖观察[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2006,24(3):298-301. 被引量:58
  • 5吴洪晔,张超杰,窦浩生.梗阻性结肠癌52例治疗体会[J].中国医刊,2007,42(7):60-61. 被引量:1
  • 6The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A compari- son of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer [J]. N Engl J Med,2004,350(20) :2050-2059.
  • 7Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-as- sisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastat- ic calon cancer: a randomised trial[ J]. Lancet, 2002, 9325 (359) :2224-2229.
  • 8Scala A, Huang A, Dowson HM, et al. Laparoscopic colorectal sur- gery-results from 200 patients [ J ]. Colorectal Dis,2007, 9 ( 8 ) :701 -705.
  • 9Liang JT, Huang KC, Lai HS,et al. Oncologic results of laparoscop- ic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers : a randomized controlled trial [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2007, 14(1) :109-117.
  • 10Han KS, Choi GS, Park JS, et al. Short-term Outcomes of a Laparo- scopic Left Hemicolectomy for Descending Colon Cancer: Retrospective Comparison with an Open Left Hemicolectomy [ J ]. J Korean Soc Coloprocto1,2010 ,26 ( 5 ) :347-353.

共引文献24

同被引文献54

  • 1尹丰,田增民,王田苗,赵全军,卢旺盛,王亚明,魏军,张国来,刘达,白茫茫,郝秋星,于雪,陈延,衣志刚.第五代立体定向机器人系统的临床应用研究[J].中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2008,13(8):355-357. 被引量:21
  • 2陈延,田增民,吴生贵,张国来,白茫茫,衣志刚,赵开胜,韩繁龙.机器人辅助脑外科立体定向手术临床应用研究(附30例报告)[J].中国综合临床,2007,23(9):815-816. 被引量:3
  • 3NISSEN R. A simple operation for control of reflux esophagitis. Schweiz Med Wochenschr, 1956,86 : 590-592.
  • 4Kane TD, Brown MF, Chen MK. Position paper on laparoscopic an- tireflux operations in infants and children for gastroesophageal reflux disease American Pediatric Surgery Association. J Pediatr Surg, 2009,44:1034-1040.
  • 5Georgeson KE. Laparoscopic gastrostomy and fundoplication. Pediatr Ann, 1993,22 : 675-677.
  • 6Lobe TE. Laparoscopie fundoplication. Semin Pediatr Surg, 1993, 2:178-181.
  • 7Giulianotti PC,Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. Robot-assisted laparo- scopic pancreatic surgery: Single-surgeon experience. Surg En- dosc, 2010,24. 1646-1657.
  • 8Vereczkel A,Bubb H, Feussner H. Laparoscopic surgery and er- gonomics:It's time to think of ourselves as well. Surg Endosc, 2003,17:1680-1682.
  • 9Cundy TP, Shetty K, Clark J, et al. The first decade of robotic surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg, 2013,48 : 858-865.
  • 10Lehnert M,Richter B,Beyer PA, et al. A prospective study com- paring operative time in conventional laparoscopic and robotically assisted Thal semifundoplication in children. J Pediatr Surg, 2006,41 : 1392-1396.

引证文献8

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部