期刊文献+

我国转型期学校教育X效率研究——基于DEA的实证分析 被引量:1

Research on School Education Low X-Efficiency during the Transition Period——Based on the Perspective of DEA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学校教育的X效率长期被忽视。在社会转型过程中,教师身份从计划经济体制下的"单位人"变为市场经济体制下的"契约人"是造成或影响学校教育X效率的重要因素之一。运用DEA方法对某中学评估发现教师身份变迁对学校教育X效率影响较大,且消极影响大于积极影响。因此需要国家、社会和教育机构共同协作,促进法律和制度的完善,从教师的角度出发,以人为本,采取科学有效的措施提高学校教育运行效率。 The school education low X-efficiency has been neglected for a long time During the transition period inChina, the identity change is one key factor of of teachers has become from the "Unit Person" into "Contract Person" The causing or influencing the school education low X-efficiency After using the DEA to estimate a school that was selected, we find that the change has great effect on the school education low X-efficiency, and the negative effect is stronger So, community and schools are needed Also, we must improve th the joi e legisl nt efforts of the whole nation, the ation and system, put people first, and take scientific and effective measures from the teacher's angle to increase the efficiency of schools
出处 《教育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期29-34,共6页 Education Science
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划教育部规划课题(FHB110070) 教育部人文社科青年基金项目(11YJC880078)"新疆城镇化进程中基础教育资源布局问题研究"的阶段性成果
关键词 学校教育X效率 转型期 教师身份变迁 DEA school education low X-efficiency transition period identity of teachers DEA
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献28

  • 1张宁,胡鞍钢,郑京海.应用DEA方法评测中国各地区健康生产效率[J].经济研究,2006,41(7):92-105. 被引量:170
  • 2刘小怡.X效率理论对提高高校内部运行效率的借鉴意义[J].教育与经济,2006,22(3):19-23. 被引量:10
  • 3Yongmei Hu, Zhi Zhang & Wenyan Liang. (2009). Efficiency of primary schools in Beijing, China: an evaluation by data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Educational Management. Vol. 23 No. 1, pp. 34-50.
  • 4Coelli T. (2005). An Introduction to efficiency and Productivity Analysis (2th edition ). USA:Springer Science Business Media Inc.
  • 5Pastor J. T, Ruiz J. L. & Sirvent I. (1999). A statistical test for detecting influential observations in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research. Vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 542- 554.
  • 6Ray S. C. ( 1991 ). Resource-Use Efficiency in Public Schools: A Study of Connectieut Data. Management Science. Vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 1620-1628.
  • 7Kirjavainen T, Loikkanent HA. (1998). Efficiency differences of finnish senior secondary schools: An application of DEA and Tobit analysis. Economics of Education Review. Vol. 17, No. 4 ,pp. 377-394.
  • 8Barrow M Economics Cooper S. ( 1991 ). Measuring local education authority performance : A frontier approach. of Education Review. Vol. 10 ,no. 1, pp. 19-27.
  • 9T. & COHN E. (1997). Estimation of a Frontier Production Function for the South Carolina Educational Process. Economics of Education Review. Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 313-327.
  • 10Bessent A. & Bessent W. (1980). Determining the Comparative Efficiency of Schools through Data Envelopment Analysis. Educational Adminstriation Quarterly. Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 57-75.

共引文献312

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部