期刊文献+

Real-time total system error estimation: Modeling and application in required navigation performance 被引量:2

Real-time total system error estimation: Modeling and application in required navigation performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 In required navigation performance(RNP), total system error(TSE) is estimated to provide a timely warning in the presence of an excessive error. In this paper, by analyzing the underlying formation mechanism, the TSE estimation is modeled as the estimation fusion of a fixed bias and a Gaussian random variable. To address the challenge of high computational load induced by the accurate numerical method, two efficient methods are proposed for real-time application, which are called the circle tangent ellipse method(CTEM) and the line tangent ellipse method(LTEM),respectively. Compared with the accurate numerical method and the traditional scalar quantity summation method(SQSM), the computational load and accuracy of these four methods are extensively analyzed. The theoretical and experimental results both show that the computing time of the LTEM is approximately equal to that of the SQSM, while it is only about 1/30 and 1/6 of that of the numerical method and the CTEM. Moreover, the estimation result of the LTEM is parallel with that of the numerical method, but is more accurate than those of the SQSM and the CTEM. It is illustrated that the LTEM is quite appropriate for real-time TSE estimation in RNP application. In required navigation performance(RNP), total system error(TSE) is estimated to provide a timely warning in the presence of an excessive error. In this paper, by analyzing the underlying formation mechanism, the TSE estimation is modeled as the estimation fusion of a fixed bias and a Gaussian random variable. To address the challenge of high computational load induced by the accurate numerical method, two efficient methods are proposed for real-time application, which are called the circle tangent ellipse method(CTEM) and the line tangent ellipse method(LTEM),respectively. Compared with the accurate numerical method and the traditional scalar quantity summation method(SQSM), the computational load and accuracy of these four methods are extensively analyzed. The theoretical and experimental results both show that the computing time of the LTEM is approximately equal to that of the SQSM, while it is only about 1/30 and 1/6 of that of the numerical method and the CTEM. Moreover, the estimation result of the LTEM is parallel with that of the numerical method, but is more accurate than those of the SQSM and the CTEM. It is illustrated that the LTEM is quite appropriate for real-time TSE estimation in RNP application.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第6期1544-1553,共10页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2010CB731805) the Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 60921001) the Special Fund for Basic Research on Scientific Instruments of China (No. 2011YQ04008301)
关键词 Aviation Estimation Navigation Required navigation performance Total system error Aviation Estimation Navigation Required navigation performance Total system error
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1Performance-based navigation (PBN) manual. 3rd ed. DOC 9613-AN/937. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization, 2008.
  • 2Anderson M R. Flight technical error model for nonstationary random turbulence. AIAA-2001-4265, 2001.
  • 3Levy B S, Som P, Greenhaw R. Analysis of flight technical error on straight, final approach segments. 59th Annual Meeting Proceedings of ION. 2003; 456-467.
  • 4Hall T, Soares M S. Analysis of localizer and glide slope flight technical error. IEEE/AIAA 27th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. 2008; 2.D.2-1-2.D.2-9.
  • 5Williams D M, Consiglio M C, Murdoch J L, et al. Flight technical error analysis of the SATS higher volume operations simulation and flight experiments. 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. 2005; 13.B.l-l-13.B.l-12.
  • 6Doyle J C, Stein G. Multivariable feedback design: concepts for a classical/modern synthesis. [EEE Transactions on Automatic Control 1981 ; 26(1 ): 4-16.
  • 7Minto K D, Chow J H, Beseler J. An explicit model-matching approach to lateral-axis autopilot design. American Control Conference. 1989; 585-591.
  • 8Javid S H, Hammond R A, Ummel B R, et al. A multi-variablecontroldesignforthelateralaxisautopilotofatransportaircraft.AmericanControlConference.1989;615.620.
  • 9DoyleJC.GuaranteedmarginsforLQGregulators.IEEE7ransactionsonAutomaticControll978;23(4、:756—757.
  • 10KwakemaakH.Optimallowsensitivitylinearfeed-backsystems.Automatica1969;5/3):279-286.

共引文献25

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部