期刊文献+

IER: ID-ELOC-RLOC BASED ARCHITECTURE FOR NEXT GENERATION INTERNET

IER: ID-ELOC-RLOC BASED ARCHITECTURE FOR NEXT GENERATION INTERNET
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The scalability and mobility issues in current Internet architecture have drawn a lot of attentions from researchers. However, there are still many problems in current solutions. In this paper, we argue that three spaces, i.e., endpoint IDentifier(ID), Endpoint Locator(ELoc) and Routing Locator(RLoc), are necessary to realize two separations, i.e., separating identifier from locator and separating edge networks from the transit core. Following this argument, we design ID-ELoc-RLoc based architecture, i.e., IER, a separation approach to solve both mobility and scalability issues. After separating identifier from locator, mobile endpoints can ensure continuity of communications across IP address changes since their IDs do not change during moving. After separating edge networks from the transit core, the size and dynamics of global routing table would not be affected by traffic engineering, multi-homing, etc. in edge networks. In this paper, we introduce the definitions, framework, and implementation considerations of our IER architecture in details. The scalability and mobility issues in current Internet architecture have drawn a lot of attentions from researchers. However, there are still many problems in current solutions. In this paper, we argue that three spaces, i.e., endpoint IDentifier (ID), Endpoint Locator (ELoc) and Routing Locator (RLoc), are necessary to realize two separations, i.e., separating identifier from locator and separating edge networks from the transit core. Following this argument, we design ID-ELoc-RLoc based architecture, i.e., IER, a separation approach to solve both mobility and scalability issues. After separating identifier from locator, mobile endpoints can ensure continuity of communications across IP address changes since their IDs do not change during moving. After separating edge networks from the transit core, the size and dynamics of global routing table would not be affected by traffic engineering, multi-homing, etc. in edge networks. In this paper, we introduce the definitions, framework, and implementation considerations of our IER architecture in details.
出处 《Journal of Electronics(China)》 2014年第6期519-536,共18页 电子科学学刊(英文版)
基金 Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.61202356,61170211) Tsinghua-Cisco Joint Research Lab(No.20133000186) Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program(No.20121302141)
关键词 Internet architecture ROUTING SCALABILITY MOBILITY Internet architecture Routing Scalability Mobility
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1D.Meyer,L.Zhang,and K.Fall.Report from the iab workshop on routing and addressing.RFC4984,September 2007.
  • 2E.Nordmark and M.Bagnulo.Shim6:Level 3 multihoming shim protocol for ipv6.RFC5533,June 2009.
  • 3R.Moskowitz,P.Nikander,P.Jokela,and T.Henderson.Host identity protocol.RFC5201,April 2008.
  • 4T.Henderson,J.Ahrenholz,and J.Kim.Experience with the host identity protocol for secure host mobility and multihoming.Wireless Communications and Networking 2003.New Orleans,LA,USA,March 2003,Vol.3,2120-2125.
  • 5D.Farinacci,V.Fuller,D.Meyer,and D.Lewis.Locator/Id Separation Protocol (LISP).http://tools.ietf.org/html/draftietf-lisp-18,December 2011.
  • 6D.Jen,M.Meisel,H.Yan,D.Massey,L.Wang,B.Zhang,and L.Zhang.Towards a new internet routing architecture:Arguments for separating edges from transit core.In ACM HotNets,2008.
  • 7J.Laganier and L.Eggert.Host Identity Protocol (HIP) rendezvous extension.RFC5204,April 2008.
  • 8P.Nikander and J.Laganier.Host Identity Protocol (HIP) domain name system (dns) extensions.RFC5205,April 2008.
  • 9D.Farinacci,D.Lewis,D.Meyer,and C.White.LISP mobile node.http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-meyerlisp-mn-06,2011.
  • 10R.Moskowitz and P.Nikander.Host Identity Protocol (HIP) architecture.RFC4423,May 2006.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部