期刊文献+

Prediction of flow stress of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rate compression at elevated temperatures 被引量:7

Prediction of flow stress of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rate compression at elevated temperatures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 An artificial neural network(ANN) constitutive model and JohnsoneC ook(Je C) model were developed for 7017 aluminium alloy based on high strain rate data generated from split Hopkinson pressure bar(SHPB) experiments at various temperatures. A neural network configuration consists of both training and validation, which is effectively employed to predict flow stress. Temperature, strain rate and strain are considered as inputs, whereas flow stress is taken as output of the neural network. A comparative study on Johnsone Cook(Je C) model and neural network model was performed. It was observed that the developed neural network model could predict flow stress under various strain rates and temperatures. The experimental stressestrain data obtained from high strain rate compression tests using SHPB over a range of temperatures(25 e300 C), strains(0.05e0.3) and strain rates(1500e4500 s 1) were employed to formulate JeC model to predict the flow stress behaviour of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rate loading. The JeC model and the back-propagation ANN model were developed to predict the flow stress of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rates, and their predictability was evaluated in terms of correlation coefficient(R) and average absolute relative error(AARE). R and AARE for the J-C model are found to be 0.8461 and 10.624%, respectively, while R and AARE for the ANN model are 0.9995 and 2.58%, respectively. The predictions of ANN model are observed to be in consistent with the experimental data for all strain rates and temperatures. An artificial neural network (ANN) constitutive model and Johnson-Cook (J-C) model were developed for 7017 aluminium alloy based on high strain rate data generated from split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) experiments at various temperatures. A neural network configuration consists of both training and validation, which is effectively employed to predict flow stress. Temperature, strain rate and strain are considered as inputs, whereas flow stress is taken as output of the neural network. A comparative study on Johnson-Cook (J-C) model and neural network model was performed. It was observed that the developed neural network model could predict flow stress under various strain rates and tem- peratures. The experimental stress-strain data obtained from high strain rate compression tests using SHPB over a range of temperatures (25℃-300 ℃), strains (0.05-0.3) and strain rates (1500-4500 s^- 1) were employed to formulate J-C model to predict the flow stress behaviour of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rate loading. The J-C model and the back-propagation ANN model were developed to predict the flow stress of 7017 aluminium alloy under high strain rates, and their predictability was evaluated in terms of correlation coefficient (R) and average absolute relative error (AARE). R and AARE for the J-C model are found to be 0.8461 and 10.624%, respectively, while R and AARE for the ANN model are 0.9995 and 2.58%, respectively. The predictions of ANN model are observed to be in consistent with the experimental data for all strain rates and temperatures. Copyright 2014, China Ordnance Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
出处 《Defence Technology(防务技术)》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第1期93-98,共6页 Defence Technology
基金 Defence Research and Development Organization, India for financial help in carrying out the experiments
关键词 Aluminium ALLOY Artificial NEURAL NETWORK Johnson-Cook model Aluminium alloy Artificial neural network Johnsone Cook model
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Lee WS, Lin CF. Plastic deformation and fracture behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V alloy loaded with high strain rate under various temperatures. MatSci Eng A 1998;241(1e2):48-59.
  • 2El-Magd E, Abouridouane A. Characterization, modeling and simulationof deformation and fracture behaviour of the light weight wrought alloysunder high strain rate loading. Int J Impact Eng 2006;32:741-58.
  • 3Mousavi ASH, Madaah-Hosseini HR, Bahrami. Flow stress optimizationfor 304 stainless steel under cold and warm compression by artificialneural network and genetic algorithm. J Mater Design 2007;28:609-15.
  • 4Odeshi AG, Al-Ameeri S, Bassim MN. Effect of high strain rate onplastic deformation of a low alloy steel subjected to ballistic impact. JMat Process Tech 2005;162-163:162-3.
  • 5Mohr D, Gary G, Lundberg B. Evaluation of stress-strain curve estimatesin dynamic experiments. Int J Impact Eng 2010;37:161-9.
  • 6Lee WS, Sue WC, Lin CF, Wu CJ. The strain rate and temperaturedependence of the dynamic impact properties of 7075 aluminium alloy. JMat Process Tech 2000;100:116-22.
  • 7Hou QY, Wang JT. A modified JohnsoneCook constitutive model forMg-Gd-Y alloy extended to a wide range of temperatures. Comput MaterSci 2010;50:147-52.
  • 8Ji G, Li F, Li Q, Li H, Li Z. A comparative study on Arrhenius-typeconstitutive model and artificial neural network model to predict hightemperaturedeformation behavior in Aermet100 steel. J Mater SciEngg A 2011;528:4774-82.
  • 9Han Y, Qiao G, Sun J, Zou D. A comparative study on constitutiverelationship of as-cast 904L austenitic stainless steel during hot deformationbased on Arrhenius-type and artificial neural network models.Comput Mater Sci 2013;67:93-103.
  • 10Sun Y, Zeng WD, Zhao YQ, Qi YL, Ma X, Han YF. Development ofconstitutive relationship model of Ti600 alloy using artificial neuralnetwork. Comput Mater Sci 2010;48:686-91.

同被引文献52

引证文献7

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部