斯坦福情绪调节量表在我国中学生中的信、效度检验

Reliability and Validity of Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in Middle School Students

目的:检验情绪调节量表在中国中学生中的信度和效度。方法:研究首先选取了1167名11-19岁的中国青少年进行测试,在所有样本中抽取130人间隔2周实施重测,同时测查了中文版大五人格量表和积极消极情绪量表。结果:认知重评分量表的内部一致性系数为0.72,表达抑制分量表的内部一致性系数为0.66。两周之后认知重评分量表的重测信度为0.74,表达抑制分量表的重测信度为0.73。探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析结果支持了中文版情绪调节量表的二因素模型。中文版的情绪调节量表的认知重评维度与宜人性、严谨性、外向性以及开放性维度呈显著正相关,与神经质呈显著负相关,与积极情绪体验呈显著正相关,与消极情绪体验呈显著负相关;情绪调节量表的表达抑制维度与宜人性、外向性呈显著负相关,与神经质呈显著正相关,与积极情绪体验呈显著负相关,与消极情绪体验呈显著正相关。结论:情绪调节量表中文版在中学生中具有较好的信、效度。

Objective： The goal of this research was to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in middle school students. Methods： A sample of 1167 Chinese adolescents aged 11-19（M= 15.55, SD=1.82） was chosen as subjects, and 130 of them were randomly selected to be retested（2 weeks interval）. The Chinese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule and Big Five Questionnaire were selected as criterion measurement. Results： Cronbach＇ s αreliability coefficients were 0.72 for the Reappraisal scale and 0.66 for the Suppression scale. Testretest reliability across 2 weeks was 0.74 for Reappraisal and 0.73 for Suppression. The results of confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the two factor correlated model fit was acceptable. In the Chinese version of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, reappraisal was positively correlated with positive affect, extraversion, openness, conscientiousness and agreeableness, and negatively correlated with negative affect and neuroticism; suppression was negatively correlated with the positive affect, extraversion, and openness, and positively correlated with negative affect and neuroticism. Conclusion： The Chinese version of Emotion Regulation Questionnaire is satisfactorily valid and reliable in middle school students.