基于《大学英语课程教学要求》的中国大学英语语言能力标准研究被引量：6

A Study on China's College English Proficiency Standards:Based on an Analysis of College English Curriculum Requirements

下载PDF

导出

摘要本文阐述了构建中国大学英语语言能力标准的重要意义,梳理了过去60多年语言能力的界定和语言能力标准的发展阶段。从语言能力标准的视角,对《大学英语课程教学要求》中的教学性质和目标、教学要求、教学评估和学生英语能力自评/互评表做了定量、定性相结合的分析,指出了它在理论支撑、描述语使用和研制方法等方面存在的一些缺陷。基于此,提出了新形势下基于语料库、以实证数据驱动的中国大学英语能力量表的研制路线。 This paper expounds the significance of constructing China＇ s College English language proficiency standards, and combs the definitions of language competence as well as the development stages of language proficiency standards in the past 60 years. From the perspective of language proficiency standards, it gives an analysis of the character and objectives of College English, teaching requirements, evaluation and self-assess- ment/peer assessment form for students＇ English competence in College English Curriculum Requirements, and points out some drawbacks in terms of theoretical support, descriptor usage and development approach. Based on the above analysis, it is suggested that an empirical corpus-based, data-driven approach should be adopted to develop China＇ s College English proficiency standards.

作者王勃然赵雯金檀

机构地区东北大学外国语学院

出处《山东外语教学》 2015年第1期34-43,共10页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

基金国家社科基金重点项目"基于语料库的大学英语语言能力标准特征参数研究"(项目编号:13AYY005) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目"基于国际学习者语料库的大学英语语言能力研究"(项目编号:N120415002)阶段性成果之一

关键词语言能力语言能力标准《大学英语课程教学要求》实证语料能力标准 language competence language proficiency standard College English Curriculum Requirements empirical corpus-based proficiency standard

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献42

1Bachman, L. Fundamental Consideratioas in ixmguage Testing[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
2Bachman, L. & A. Palmer. Language Testing in Practice[ M]. Oxford: Oxtord University Press, 1996.
3Bachman, L. & A. Palmer. lxtnguage Assessment in Practice: Developing bmguage Assessment aad Justifying Their Use in the Real World [ M]. Oxtord: Oxtord University Press, 2010.
4Brown, G. et al. Language and Understanding [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
5Brown, G. , A. Pocock, M. J. Zhao & M. Luj6n. Conditional likelihood maximization: A unifying framework for in- formation theoretic feature selection [ J ]. The Journal of Machine. Learning Research, 2012,13 : 27 - 66.
6Canale, M. & M. Swain. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing[J]. Applied Linguistics, 1980, ( 1 ) : 1 - 47.
7Celce, M. & M. Murcia. Rethinking the Role of Communicative Competence in Language Teaching[ M]. Dordren/: Springer, 2007.
8Chapelle, C. A. & D. Douglas. Assessing Language Ability by Computer[ M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
9Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax[ M]. Cambridge, MA. : MIT Press, 1965.
10Council of Europe ( CoE ). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages : Learning, Teaching, Assess- ment (CEFR) [ M ]. Strasbourg: Council of Europe/Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2001.