期刊文献+

证券市场信息不对称的度量——基于改进的PIN模型实证研究

The measure of information asymmetry in the stock market:An empirical study of adjusted PIN model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 知情交易概率(PIN)模型是最早用来度量市场信息不对称程度的模型,为市场微观经济理论做出了巨大贡献。然而,PIN模型所隐含的买卖指令之间的相关关系与实际并不相符。Duarte and Young(2009)通过增加指令冲击流等因素,对PIN模型进行了改进。利用沪深两市27家金融公司股票交易高频数据,对PIN模型和改进的PIN模型所隐含的买入量和卖出量相关性进行实证研究,验证两个模型与实际数据是否相符。27只股票运算结果显示,PIN模型隐含的买入量和卖出量之间的负相关关系与实际数据中买入量和卖出量之间的正相关关系并不相符,而改进的PIN模型隐含的买卖量之间的正相关性与实际数据一致。 Probability of Informed Trading (PIN) model is the first to measure the degree of the asymmetric informa tion, which has made tremendous contributions to the market micro economic theory. However, the correlation between buyers and sellers implied by the PIN model is not consistent with that in real data. Duarte and Young(2009)improved the PIN model by considering the factor of increasing the market order flow shock. In this paper, trading data from 27 companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen have been used to make comparative analysis between the PIN and AdjPIN, to verify the cor relation between buyers and sellers. The experimental results showed that that the negative correlation between buy and sell orders implied in the PIN model was not consistent with the positive correlation in real data, while the positive correlation implied in the AdjPIN model was consistent with that in real data.
作者 庄明明
出处 《周口师范学院学报》 CAS 2015年第1期99-102,共4页 Journal of Zhoukou Normal University
关键词 知情交易概率 改进的(PIN)模型 信息不对称 probability of informed trading AdjPIN information asymmetry
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1EASI.EY D, KIEFERN, O' HARA M, PAPERMANJ. Liquidity, information, and infrequently traded stocks[J].Journal of Finance, 1996,51(4) : 1405 - 1436.
  • 2EASLEY D, O' HARA M. Price, trade size, and infor mation insecurities markets[J].Journal of Financial E conomics, 1987,19:69 - 90.
  • 3EASLEY D,O' HARA M. Time and the process of se curity price adjustment[J].Journal of Finance, 1992,47: 577 - 605.
  • 4EASI.EY D,O'HARA M,SAARG. How stock splits affect trading : A mierostructurc: approach[J ].Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2001, :t6 : 25 - 52.
  • 5EASLEY D,HVIDKJAER S,O' HARA M. Is Informa tion risk a determinant of asset returns[J].Journ: of Finance,2002,57:2185 - 2221.
  • 6VEGA C.Stock price reaction to public and private in formation[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2006,82: 103-133.
  • 7DUARTE J, YOUNG L.Why is PIN priced [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2009,91 :119 - 138.
  • 8郑振龙,杨伟.基于经典PIN模型的股票信息风险测度研究[J].管理科学,2010,23(6):91-99. 被引量:7
  • 9LEE C, READYM. Inferring trade direction from intra day data[J].The Journal of Finance, 1991,46(2) : 733 - 746.

二级参考文献20

  • 1Bagehot W.The Only Game in Town[J].Financial Analysts Journal,1971,27(2):12-14.
  • 2Glosten L,Milgrom P,Lawrence R.Bid,Ask and Transaction Prices in a Specialist Market with Heterogeneously Informed Traders[J].Journal of Financial Economics,1985,14(1):71-100.
  • 3Easley D,Hvidkjaer S,0' Hara M.Is Information Risk a Determinant of Asset Returns?[J].The Journal of Finance,2002,57(5):2185-2221.
  • 4Copeland T E,Galai D.Information Effects on the Bid-ask Spread[J].Journal of Finance,1983,38(5):1457-1469.
  • 5Stoll H R.Inferring the Components of the Bid-ask Spread:Theory and Empirical Tests[J].Journal of Finance,1989,XLIV(1):115-134.
  • 6Sarin A,Shastri K A,Shastri K.Ownership Structure and Stock Market Liquidity[R].Pittsburgh:University of Pittsburgh,2000.
  • 7Easley D,Kiefer N M,O'Hara M,Paperman J B.Liquidity,Information and Infrequently Traded Stocks[J].Journal of Finance,1996,51(4):1405-1436.
  • 8Easley D,Kiefer N M,O'Hara M.One Day in the Life of a Very Common Stock[J].Review of Financial Studies,1997,10(3):805-835.
  • 9Brockman P,Chung D Y.Informed and Uninformed Trading in an Electronic,Order-Driven Environment[J].Financial Review,2005,35(2):125-146.
  • 10Boehmer E,Grammig J,Theissen E.Estimating the Probability of Informed Trading-Does Trade Misclassification Matter?[J].Journal of Financial Markets,2007,10(1):26-47.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部