新兴产业平台创新生态系统的配套产品合作开发机制研究被引量：10

Study on the Collaborative Development Mechanism of Supporting Product in Platform Innovation Ecosystem

下载PDF

导出

摘要通过建立平台企业参与下的配套产品的合作开发模型,提出了平台企业与配套企业的收益共享契约,研究平台企业的资源投入性质(互补或替代)对配套企业的研发努力程度及收益共享系数的影响,分析新兴产业平台创新生态系统的配套产品的合作开发机制。研究表明:当平台企业与配套企业资源互补时,配套企业研发投入的努力程度及收益分享系数随着平台企业投入的增加而增加;当平台企业与配套企业资源替代时,配套企业研发投入的努力程度及收益分享系数随着平台企业投入的增加而减少。 This paper puts forward a revenue sharing contract between the platform company and the supporting company by creating a collaborative development model of the supporting product in the ecosystem, and this paper studies the platform company＇s investment resource property＇s （ Complementary or substitution） impact on the supporting company＇s R＆D efforts and the revenue sharing factor, analyzes collaborative development mechanism of supporting product of emerging industry＇s platform innovation ecosystem. The research indicates that when Platform Company and supporting company＇s resource is complementary, the supporting company＇s R ＆D effort level and revenue sharing coefficient increase as the platform company＇s investment increases. When platform company and supporting company＇s resource is complementary is substitu- tion, the supporting company＇s R ＆D effort level and revenue sharing coefficient decrease as the platform company＇s invest- ment increases.

作者吴绍波

机构地区重庆工商大学商务策划学院

出处《软科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期51-55,共5页 Soft Science

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71303271) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(12YJC630234 13YJC630246) 四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地系统科学与企业发展研究中心规划项目(Xq13c04 Xq13c01)

关键词新兴产业平台创新生态系统配套产品合作开发机制 emerging industry platform innovation ecosystem supporting product collaborative development

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献15

1Annabelle Gawer, Michael A, Cusumano. How Companies Become Platform Leaders [ J ]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2008,49 (2) :28 -35.
2Baldwin C Y and K B Clark. Design rules: The Power of Modularity [ M]. Cambridge, MA MIT Press,2000.
3Schilling M A. Towards a General Modular Systems Theory and its Application to Inter-firm Product Modularity[ J]. Academy of Man- agement Review,2000,25 ( 2 ) : 312 - 334.
4Suarez F F. Battles for Technological Dominance: An Integrated Frmnework [ J]. Research Policy, 2004,33 (2) : 271 - 286.
5Murmann J P,K Frenken. Towards a Systematic Framework for Re- search on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Indus- trial Change [ J]. Research Policy, 2006,35 ( 7 ) :925 - 952.
6Robert K, Perrons. The Open Kimono: How Intel Balances Trust and Power to Maintain Platform Leadership [ J ]. Research Policy, 2009,38 (7) : 1300 - 1312.
7Ron Adner, Rahul Kapoor. Value Creation in Innovation Ecosys- tems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects firm Performance in New Technology Generations [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal,2010,31 ( 3 ) : 306 - 333.
8Satish Nambisan,Robert A, Baron. Entrepreneurship in Innovation Ecosystems:Entrepreneurs' Serf-regulatory Processes and Their Im- plications for New Venture Success [ J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2013,37 (5) : 1071 - 1097.
9Ceccagnoli M, Forman C, Huang P, et al. Co-creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem : The Case of Enterprise Software [J]. MIS Quarterly, 2012,36( 1 ) :263 -290.
10S Scholten, U Schohen. Platform-based Innovation Management: Directing External Innovational Efforts in Platform Ecosystems [ J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy,2012,2 ( 3 ) : 164 - 184.