期刊文献+

论著作权集体管理组织的反垄断规制 被引量:12

Study on Antitrust Regulation of Copyright Collective Management Organizations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由工商行政管理总局牵头起草的《禁止滥用知识产权排除、限制竞争行为的规定(征求意见稿)》第14条细化了反垄断法在规制著作权集体管理组织的作用和调整对象。但对于如何认定集体管理组织滥用市场支配地位,以及如何协调著作权法与反垄断法在规制集体管理组织垄断行为时的关系问题,立法者和学界的认识存在偏差。鉴于集体管理组织在平衡著作权法各主体利益上的制度功能,应优先适用著作权法专门性监督。反垄断一般执法作为补充,可在专门性监督无法有效发挥作用时,在个别情况下适用。 State Administration for Industry and Commerce of the People's Republic of China has drafted "Act of Prohibition of Abuse of Intellectual Property Rights to Eliminate or Restrict Competition", art. 14 of which specifies the role and object of Antitrust Law to regulate copyright collective management organization(CMOs). However, there exist different perceptions on the identification of abuse of the market dominant position of CMOs and the relations coordination between Copyright Law and Antitrust Law when regulates the monopolistic behavior of CMOs. Taking into account the function of CMOs to balance the interests of each party of Copyright Law, it is suggested that the specialized supervision of Copyright Law should be applied preferentially, and complemented by general enforcement of Antitrust Law in individual cases when specialized supervision is unable to play an effective role.
作者 李陶
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期34-40,共7页 Intellectual Property
关键词 著作权集体管理组织 滥用市场支配地位 反垄断一般执法监督 著作权法专门性监督 CMOs abuse of the market dominant position general supervision of Antitrust Law specialized supervision of Copyright Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Properly and Competition Law, Copyright, Competition and Development, 12. 2013 Munchen, pp.210.
  • 2Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property and Competition Law, p.234.
  • 3Drexl, Collective Management of Copyrights and the EU Principle of Free Movement of Services after the OSA Judgment, Springer 2014, p. 464.
  • 4Para. X. A. ofthe ASCAP Consent Decree, supra n. 737.
  • 5Schack, Urheber- und Urhebervertragsrecht, 6. Auflage (2013), S.628.
  • 6Decision of the Commission of 2 June 1971, Case IV/26.760 - GEMA, [1971] OJ 134, p. 15.
  • 7Decision of the Commission of 29 October 1981, Case IV/29.839 - GVL, [1981] OJ No. L 370, p. 49.
  • 8Goldmann, Die kollektive Wahrnehmung musikalischer Recht in den USA und Deutschland, 2001 M ti nchen, S. 301.
  • 9Case 127/73 BRT v SABAM [1974] ECR 313. supra 113, para. 12.
  • 10Competition Authority, Decision No. 326 of 18 May 1994, Notification No. CA/2/91E-Performing Right Society and individual creators/publishers (Assignment of Copyright), paras 87-88, 107.

二级参考文献29

  • 1张维迎.法律:通过第三方实施的行为规范[J].读书,2000(11):76-81. 被引量:14
  • 2[美]理查德·波斯纳 蒋兆康译.《法律的经济分析》[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1997年版.第709页.
  • 3[德]柯武刚 史漫飞.《制度经济学,社会秩序与公共政策》[M].商务印书馆,2000年版.第152-156页.
  • 4[美]理查德·波斯纳.《法律理论的前沿》.武欣,凌斌泽.中国政法大学出版社,2003年版,第149页.
  • 5王自强:《著作权人“被代表”的思考》,《法制日报》2012年4月18日.
  • 6Axhamn, Johan and Ouibault, Lucie, Cross-Border Extended Collective Licensing: A Solution to Online Dissemination of Europe's Cultural Heritage (February 8, 2012). Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2012-22, pp47.
  • 7Bernard Lang, Orphan Works and The GoGgle Book Search Settlement, New York Law School Law Review, VOLUME 55 I 2010/11, pp119.
  • 8Riis, Thomas and Schovsbo, Jens, Extended Collective Licenses and the Nordic Experience - It' s a Hybrid but is It a Volvo or a Lemon ? (Tanuary 12, 2010). Columbia 7ournal of Law and the Arts, Vol. 33, Issue IV, pp471.
  • 9UK Intellectual Property Office, Impact Assessment of Extended Collective Licensing (May 18th, 2012), pp9, http://www, ipo. gov. uk/consult-ia-bislO54-20120702, pdf,2013年5月26日访问.
  • 10Gervais, Daniel J., Application of an Extended Collective Licensing Regime in Canada: Principles and Issues Related to Implementation (Tune I, 2003). Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 11-26, pp21.

共引文献16

二级引证文献56

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部