期刊文献+

伏击营销的商标法审思

The Trademark Law Review On Ambush Marketing
下载PDF
导出
摘要 伏击营销是现代大型文体活动中屡见不鲜的一种社会现象,且行为方式多样、社会评价不一。从商标法角度对伏击营销行为进行剖析,不仅能够明晰伏击营销的基本特性、掌握其合法与非法的界限,而且能够了解伏击营销行为所涉的多重利益冲突。基于利益平衡的思路,提出更好地利用商标法规则化解各相关利益主体的矛盾,从现有制度中找寻解决伏击营销困境的对策。 Ambush marketing is one of social phenomenon with mixed reviews in modem culture and sports activities. In the perspective of trademark law, this paper analyzes the behavior of ambush marketing in order to grasp the basic characterize and the lawful boundaries of ambush marketing and understand the various conflicts of interests during the ambush marketing practices. Based on the idea of balance of interests, it is suggested to resolve the conflict among the all related subjects using the role of trademark law and seek to solution of ambush marketing issue from existed legal system.
作者 周围
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期52-56,63,共6页 Intellectual Property
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2012106010209)
关键词 伏击营销 商标侵权 混淆可能性 利益平衡 ambush marketing trademark infringement likelihood of confusion interest balance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Stephen M. Mckelvey, Atlanta'96: Olympic Countdown to Ambush Armageddon? 4 Seton Hall J. Sport L. 397, 401 (1994).
  • 2Boston Athletic Association v. Sullivan, 867 F.2d 22 24(lst Cir. 1989).
  • 3Pirone v. MacMillan, Inc., 894 F.2d 579, 581 (2d Cir. 1990).
  • 4Warner Brothers., Inc. v. Gay Toys, Inc., 658 F.2d 76, 78 (2d Cir. 1981).
  • 5Anita M. Moorman, Christopher T. Greenwell, Consumer Attitudes of Deception and the Legality of Ambush Marketing Practices, 15 Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport 2005 183.
  • 6E. Vassallo, K. Blemaster and P. Werner, An International Look at Ambush Marketing, 95 Trademark Reporter 1338, 1355 (2005).
  • 7Jenifer Donatuti, Can China Protect the Olympics, or Should the Olympics be Protected From China.'?, 15 J. of Intellectual Property Law. 203, 207(2007).
  • 8Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Electronics Corp., 287 F.2d 492 (2d Cir. 1961).
  • 9J. Thomas Mccarthy, Mccarthy On Trademarks And Unfair Competition § 23:3 (Fourth Edition).
  • 10A & H Sportswear, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc., 166 F.3d 197, 49 U.S.P.Q.2d 1481 (3d Cir. 1999).

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部