期刊文献+

颜色组合商标的申请与保护 被引量:2

The Application and Protection of Color Combination Mark
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对颜色组合商标的保护是商标权在市场经济环境下不断扩张的必然要求。颜色组合商标自身的特殊性,导致目前在相关案件的审理上存在论理上的灰色区域。通过总结国际相关实践和案例,对颜色组合商标在申请和保护中的相关法律问题作出分析和思考,并就颜色组合商标申请要件的规范及非功能性的要求等理论和实践方面做出梳理和展望。 The protection for color combination mark meets the requirement of the expansion of the trademark right under the real market economy environment. Due to its own peculiarity, there exists the grey area on the reasoning of the protection of the color combination mark in current judicial cases. Further discussion on the issues of prosecution as well as litigation for color combination mark is significant by means of summarizing the relevant international practice and other jurisdictions' precedents. Thus, we may perfect our practice in respect of the issues of application requirements and non-functionality for the color combination mark.
作者 胡刚
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期57-63,共7页 Intellectual Property
关键词 颜色组合商标 可注册性 申请要件 非功能性 侵权判断 color combination mark registrability application requirements non-functionality infiingement judgment
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1北京市高级人民法院(2014)高民终字第382号民事判决书.
  • 2《商标审查及审理标准》,第90-91页.
  • 3TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 33 (2001).
  • 4Heidelberger Bauchemie GmbH (Case C-49/02 (ECJ June 24, 2004)).
  • 5Ralf Sieekmann v Deutsehes Patent-und Markenamt ( Case C-273/00 [2002] E.C.R. I-11737 ) .
  • 6Deere & Co. v. MTD Holdings Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1009 (S.D.N.Y. 2004).
  • 7Case C-206/01 Arsenal Football Club plc v Matthew Reed [2002] ECR 1-10273.
  • 8BP Amoco Plc v John Kelly Ltd [2001] N.I. 25; [2002] F.S.R. 5; [2001] E.T.M.R. CN14.
  • 9Emmanuel de Landtsheer v. Veuve Cliquot Ponsardin, LVHM Fashion Group, [2005] E.T.M.R. 12 (Court of Appeal of Brussels).
  • 10McCarthy, J. Thomas, Trademarks and Unfair Competition, Fourth edition, § 23:53.

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部