摘要
保障人权是美国法庭化解救助义务道德困境的法律基石,捍卫生命是法官追求人性至善的道德情怀。文章在其实质合理性的基础上,否定自冒风险、区别真假不作为、解释可转嫁性过失,证明司法调整救助义务的形式合理性。
To protect human rights is the legal footstone for America to resolve the moral dilemma of the legalization of the duty to rescue. To save a life is the moral feeling for a judge to seek the best human nature. Based on the virtual rationality, this paper negates risks by oneself, distin guishes the false nonfeasance from the true one, interprets the transferable negligence and dem onstrates the form rationality of adjusting the duty to rescue by justice.
出处
《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》
2015年第1期43-46,共4页
Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
救助义务
不作为
可转嫁性过失
the duty to rescue
nonfeasance
transferable negligence