期刊文献+

救助义务法律化的美国路径及理论

The American Path to the Legalization of the Duty to Rescue and Its Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 保障人权是美国法庭化解救助义务道德困境的法律基石,捍卫生命是法官追求人性至善的道德情怀。文章在其实质合理性的基础上,否定自冒风险、区别真假不作为、解释可转嫁性过失,证明司法调整救助义务的形式合理性。 To protect human rights is the legal footstone for America to resolve the moral dilemma of the legalization of the duty to rescue. To save a life is the moral feeling for a judge to seek the best human nature. Based on the virtual rationality, this paper negates risks by oneself, distin guishes the false nonfeasance from the true one, interprets the transferable negligence and dem onstrates the form rationality of adjusting the duty to rescue by justice.
作者 成家全
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第1期43-46,共4页 Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 救助义务 不作为 可转嫁性过失 the duty to rescue nonfeasance transferable negligence
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1James Barr Ames. Law and morals[J]. Harvard Law Review, 1908,22(2) :111-113.
  • 2John Lee Eighmy. Religious liberalism in the south during the progressive era[J]. Church History, 1969,38(3) : 359- 372.
  • 3Jennifer Alexander. Efficiencies of balance: Technical efficiency, popular efficiency, and arbitrary standards in the late progressive era USA[J]. Social Studies of Sci- ence,2008,38(3) :323-349.
  • 4Aaron Kirschenbaum. The bystander's duty to rescue in jewish law[J]. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 1980,8(2) : 204-226.
  • 5李龙.法理学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2011:143.
  • 6Marilyn Admas,Robert Admas. The problem of evil [M]. London : Oxord University Press, 1990 : 1.
  • 7Oliver Wendell Holmes. The common law[M]. Bos- ton : Little Brown and Company, 1948 : 81.
  • 8Imputed negligence[J]. Harvard Law Review, 1910,23 (4) :299-300.
  • 9Ernest J. Weinrib: The case for a duty to rescue[J]. The Yale I.aw Journal,1980,90(2) :247 250.
  • 10Francis H. Bohlen. The moral duty to aid others as a basis of tort liability[J]. U. PA. L. REV,1908,56(5) : 119-220.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部