教师话语的多模态隐喻架构分析——以“外教社杯”全国大学英语教学大赛为例被引量：6

An Analysis of Multimodal Metaphor and Frame of Teacher Talk Based on SFLEP National College English Contest

下载PDF

导出

摘要以多模态隐喻和架构理论为依据,选取"外教社杯"全国大学英语教学大赛中同一主题6个教学视频为语料,归纳贯穿教师话语的3个多模态隐喻,对比分析隐喻背后的架构。研究发现,教师话语中的多模态隐喻和架构能反映教师的教育哲学观;对同一主题的教学,教师因教学理念和教学目标不同,选择了不同的多模态隐喻和架构,这些架构决定学生对教学内容接受度的高低;即使采用相同的架构和隐喻,因选择不同的模态,突显的方面亦不同。 On the basis of multimodal metaphor theory and frame theory,six teaching video clips on the same subject are selected as data from SFLEp National College English Teaching Contest. 3 multimodal metaphors in teacher talk are summarized,and different frames behind metaphor are contrasted. It is revealed that multimodal metaphor theory and frame in teacher talk reflect teachers﹐different educational philosophy. Due to different teaching methodologies and objectives,on the same subject teachers choose different multimodal metaphors and frames which account for to what extent the teaching contents gain acceptance with the students. Because of different modes,teachers foreground different aspects of the same frame and teaching metaphor.

作者裘莹莹汪少华

机构地区淮阴工学院外国语学院南京师范大学外国语学院

出处《重庆交通大学学报（社会科学版）》 2015年第1期127-131,共5页 Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University:Social Sciences Edition

基金江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目"生态语言学视角英汉隐喻认知系统研究"(2013SJD740051)

关键词教师话语架构理论多模态隐喻教育哲学 teacher talk frame theory multimodal metaphor educational philosophy

分类号 H319 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献31

1Cazden C. Classroom Discourse:The Language of Teach- ing and Learning [ M ]. 2nd ed.. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann,2001.
2Chaudron C. Second Language Classroom:Research on Teaching and Learning [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge U- niversity Press, 1988.
3Christie F. Classroom Discourse Analysis:A Functional Perspective [ M ]. London : Continuum,2002.
4Conrad S. Corpus linguistic approaches for discourse a- nalysis [ J ]. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 2002 (22) :75 -95.
5Fillmore C J. An alternative to checklist theories of mean- ing [C]//Cathy Cogen,et al. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1975 : 123 - 131.
6Forceville C. Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising [ M ]. Lon- don: Roufledge, 1998.
7Forceville C. Multimodal metaphor in ten dutch TV com- mercials [ J ]. Public Journal of Semiotics, 2007,1 ( 1 ) : 19 - 51.
8Mittelberg I, Waugh L R. Metonymy first metaphor sec- ond :A cognitive-semiotic approach to maltimodal figures of thought in co-speech gesture [ C ]//Forceville C, Uri- os-Aparisi E. Muhimodal Metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter,2009:297 - 328.
9Musumeci D. Teacher-learner negotiation in content-based instruction: Communication at cross-purposes? [J]. Ap- plied Linguistics, 1996,17 (3) :286 - 325.
10Nunan D. Communicative language leaching:Making it work[J]. ELT Journal,1987(2) :13 -145.