临床尿常规检验方法对比研究

The Comparative Study on Clinical Urine Routine Test Methods

目的研究对比临床尿常规不同检验方法的运用价值。方法搜集2013年9月-2014年9月我院接收的行尿常规检验38例患者,按照检验方法不同分为两组,即研究组（尿干化学分析仪）与对照组（手工镜检）。观察并比较研究组与对照组的检验结果。结果研究组红细胞检验阳性率高于对照组,白细胞阳性率和蛋白质阳性率均低于对照组,两组蛋白质检验结果符合率是98.3%,红细胞是97.0%,白细胞是96.6%,结果有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论尿干化学分析仪与手工镜检在临床尿常规检验中均具有较高运用价值,但二者不可互相代替。

Objective The application value of different sampling methods in urine routine test is to be analyzed comparatively. Methods Choose 38 persons who took urine routine test in hospital from September 2013 to September 2014 and separate them into control group （urine dry chemistry analyzer） and study group （manual microscopic examination） according to different blood-sampling methods. And then observe and compare the testing results of two groups. Results Positive rate of red blood cel in study group is much higher than that in control group; however, the positive rate of leukocyte and protein in study group are much lower than counterparts in control group, the testing accuracy rate of protein content is 98.3%, it is 97.0%in testing accuracy rate of red blood cel and 96.6%in testing accuracy rate of leukocyte;such a result has statistic value（P〈0.05）;there is a treatment differential between the two groups, such a differential has statistic value（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Urine dry chemistry analyzer and manual microscopic examination are of application significance in urine routine test, and these two testing methods can not be substituted by each other.