1Atkinson, K. & Coupland, N. 1988, Accommodation as Ideology[J], Language and Communication, Vol. 8, No. 3/4.
2Bell, A. 1984, Language Style as Audience Design [J], Language in Society 13,145-204.
3Bilous, F. R. & Krauss, R. M. 1988, Dominance and Accommodation in theConversational Behaviors of Sameand Mixed-gender Dyads [J], Language and Communication,Vol. 8, No. 3/4.
4Bradac, J. J. et. al, 1988, Lexical Diversity and Magnitude of Convergent verusDivergent Style Shifting-: Perceptual and Evaluative Consequnences [J], Language andCommunication, Vol. 8, No. 3/4.
5Burt, S. M. 1994, Code Choice in Intercultural Conversation: Speech AccommodationTheory and Pragmatics [J], Pragmatics 4: 4.
6Coulmas, F. 1989, Language Adaptation [C], Cambridge: CUP.
7Coupland, N. 1995, Accommodation Theory [C], in Verschueren, Handbook ofPragmatics, Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishng Co.
8Coupland, N. & Giles, H. 1998, The Communicative contexts of Accommodation [J],Language and Communication, Vol. 8, No. 3/4
9Gallois, C. & Callan, V. J. 1988, Communication Accommodation and PrototypicalSpeake: Predicting Evaluations of Satus and Solidarity [J], language and Communication,Vol. 8, No. 3/4.
10Genesee, F. & Bourhis, R. Y. 1988, Evaluative Rteactions to Language ChoiceStrategies: The Role of Sociostructural Factors [J], Language and Communication, Vol. 8,No. 3/4
2Coup[and N, Giles H. The Communicative Contexts of Accommodation [J]. Language and Communica-tion, 1998: 36-38.
3Giles H. Language: Contexts and Consequences[M]. Keynes: Open University Press, 1991 : 52 -53.
4Bradac J. Lexieal Diversity and Magnitude of Conver- gent verus Divergent Style Shifting-: Perceptual and Evaluative Consequnences [J]. Language and Com- munication, 1988(8) :3-4.
