期刊文献+

低碳发展政策及其组合的复合效应——基于北京动态CGE模型的政策模拟和成本有效性评估 被引量:2

The Composite Effects of Policy Mix for LowCarbon Development——A Dynamic CGE Modeling and Cost Effective Analysis for Beijing Case
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于动态可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型,就北京城镇化进程中的低碳发展政策组合进行反事实的情景模拟和分析。基本结论是:提高能源效率、加快清洁能源(电力)投资、实施碳税虽然都有利于节能减排,但其对经济增长和结构调整则分别具有不同影响,相应的政策组合具有协同效应或对冲效应。因此,推动低碳发展战略,必须根据可能的政策措施和手段的环境有效性、成本有效性、行政和政治上的可行性,综合运用多种低碳发展政策工具进行优化组合,发挥政策组合的协同效应,努力将低碳发展的外部性问题内部化,改善低碳发展战略和政策的实施绩效。 The transition to a low-carbon development has gained global momentum in recent decade. China in the industrialization and the urbanization process has to find an effective and inclusive strategy with policy mix for the low-carbon development. This paper aims to highlight the synergy and offsetting effects in terms of economic growth, structure change, energy consumption, and carbon emission of policy mix at industrial level. We take Beijing as a case to employ a regional dynamic CGE model to analyze counter-faeturally the cost effective policy mix for low-carbon development in urbanization. The policies in the designed scenarios include: (1) A flat increase in energy efficiency by industry; (2) An increase in investment in electricity industry; (3) A fiat carbon tax by industry; (4) A policy pair, i.e. a mix of carbon tax and investment subsidy for energy conservation and emission reduction to keep the governmental revenue neural. The conclusion is that the cost effective low- carbon development strategy should be one on the integrated application of practical policy mix.
出处 《工业经济论坛》 2015年第1期31-47,共17页 Industrial Economy Review
基金 中国社会科学院创新工程项目 世界银行北京环境二期GEF项目"北京低碳发展研究"(批准号:TF024121-CHA)
关键词 低碳发展 政策组合 协同效应 对冲效应 CGE模型 low-carbon development policy-mix synergy effect offsetting effect CGE model
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1北京市统计局.北京统计年鉴2006[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2006.
  • 2北京市统计局.北京统计年鉴2010[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2010.
  • 3北京市人民政府.北京城市总体规划(2004-2020)[EB/OL]. http ://www.bjghw.gov.cn/web/static/ catalogs/catalog 233/233.html. 2005-4-15.
  • 4财政部.中国财政年鉴2006[M].北京:中国财政出版社,2007.
  • 5刘春兰,陈操操,陈群,朱世龙,王海华,李铮.1997年至2007年北京市二氧化碳排放变化机理研究[J].资源科学,2010,32(2):235-241. 被引量:45
  • 6郑玉歆,樊明太.中国CGE模型及政策分析[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,1998:90-174,199-219,222-148.
  • 7Aaheim, H. A. and N. Rive. A Model for Global Responses to Anthropogenic Changes in the Environment (GRACE)[R]. Report. Oslo, Norway, CICERO. 2005:05.
  • 8OECD. The Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: Policies and Options for Global Action Beyond 2012[M]. 2009.
  • 9Manne A, Mendelsohn R, Richels R. MERGE: A Model for Evaluating Regional and Global Effects of GHG Reduction Policies[J]. Energy Policy,1995, 23(1):17-34.
  • 10Zhang Zhongxiang. Macroeconomic Effects of CO2 Emissions Limits: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis for China[J] .Journal of Policy Modeling,1998, 20(2):213-250.

二级参考文献24

  • 1彭慧芳,许学工.部分国家碳减排方案及其基本依据[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(5):83-87. 被引量:4
  • 2陈海燕,蔡嗣经.北京工业终端能源消费变化的分解研究[J].中国能源,2006,28(12):28-30. 被引量:15
  • 3国家气候变化对策协调小组办公室、国家发展和改革委员会能源研究所.中国温室气体清单研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社.2007.
  • 4IPCC. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report [R]. Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.
  • 5IPCC. Working Group llI Report "Mitigation of Climate Change" [R]. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • 6Johan, A D F, Koen, S. A shapely decomposition of carbon emissions without residuals[J].Energy Policy, 2002, 30( 9):727-736.
  • 7Dubeux, C B S, Rovere, L E. Local perspectives in the control of greenhouse gas emissions-The case of Rio de Janeiro[J].Cities, 2007, 24(5):353-364.
  • 8Fleming, P D , Webber, P H. Local and regional greenhouse gas management[J]. Energy Policy, 2004,32(6):761-771.
  • 9Wang, C, Chen, J N, Zou, J. Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission in China: 1957-2000 [J].Energy, 2005, 30( 1 ):73-83.
  • 10Anne Choate, Randall Freed, Michael Gibbs. California' s greenhouse gas emissions and trends over the past decade[EB/ OL]. www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/conference/eil 1/ghg/choate.pdf, 2006/ 2009-08-12.

共引文献66

同被引文献27

引证文献2

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部