期刊文献+

吉西他滨与长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗晚期乳腺癌的临床效果分析 被引量:10

Clinical Efficacy of Gemcitabine and Navelbine Combined with Cisplatin on the Advanced Breast Cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨吉西他滨与长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗晚期乳腺癌的近期疗效。方法:选取2012年5月-2013年12月在我院接受治疗的晚期乳腺癌患者80例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。对照组给予吉西他滨+顺铂治疗,观察组给予长春瑞滨+顺铂治疗。比较两组患者的近期总有效率和不良反应的发生情况。结果:观察组治疗总有效率为70%,对照组为62.5%,两组临床疗效无显著差异(P>0.05);两组患者治疗后均出现不同程度的不良反应。其中,观察组患者血小板减少、白细胞减少、静脉炎、恶心呕吐及脱发等毒副反应的发生率为50%,而对照组患者毒副反应的发生率为72.5%。观察组显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:吉西他滨与长春瑞滨联合顺铂治疗晚期乳腺癌具有显著的临床疗效,且安全性较高,值得临床应用。 Objective:To investigate the efficacy of Gemcitabine combined Cisplatin and Navelbine combined Cisplatin in the treatment of advanced breast cancer.Methods:80 patients in our hospital from May 2012 to December 2013 were selected and randomly divided into the control group and the observation group with 40 cases in each group.The patients in the control group were treated with Gemcitabine combined Cisplatin.The patients in the observation group were treated with Navelbine combined Cisplatin.Then the clinical efficacy and the adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.Results:There was no statistically significant difference about the clinical efficacy between two groups(P〉0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 50% which was significantly lower than 72.5% in the control group with statistically significant differences(P〈0.05).Conclusion:Gemcitabine and Navelbine combined with Cisplatin have better clinical efficacy on the treatment of advanced breast cancer with better efficacy and less adverse reactions.
出处 《现代生物医学进展》 CAS 2015年第4期676-678,共3页 Progress in Modern Biomedicine
关键词 吉西他滨 长春瑞滨 顺铂 晚期乳腺癌 临床疗效 Gemcitabine Navelbine Cisplatin Advanced breast cancer Clinical effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

  • 1Tomohiro M, Kenzo S, Hiroshi O, et al. Indication for sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer when core biopsy shows ductal carcinoma in situ [J]. American Journal of Surgery, 2011,202(1):59-65.
  • 2Rahul RP, Bruce GH, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasi- on: progonostic implications, long-term outcomes, and role of axillary evaluation[J]. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, biology, p- hysics, 2012, 82(1):7-13.
  • 3Julia AS: Treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ: new data refine the risk estimates associated with various treatments [J]. British Medical Journal, 2011,343:917-918.
  • 4Andrea D, Giancarlo P, Aliana GG. Estrogen receptor in breast dustal carcinoma in situ: good cop, bad cop? [J]. Journal of Clinical Oncolog- y, 2012, 30(12):1384-1386.
  • 5Bijan A, Judy CB, Darcy LA, et al. Should axillary ultrasound be used in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ? [J]. American Journal of Surgery, 2012, 204(3):290-293.
  • 6Benjamin CW, Edward AL, Malcolm WM, et al. Outcomes of immed- iate breast reconstruction in patients undergoing single-stage sentinel lymph node biopsy and mastectomy [J]. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 2011, 66(5):564-567.
  • 7Ali RS, Philippa M, Jennifer W, et al. Preoperative needle biopsy of s- entinel lymph nodes using intradermal mierobubbles and contrast-enh- anced ultrasound in patients with breast cancer [J]. American Roentgen Ray Society, 2012, 198:465-470.
  • 8Meagan EB, Robin MT, Stefano C, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ at core-needle biopsy: meta-analysis of underestimation and predictors of invasive breast cancer [J]. Radiology, 2011,260(1):119-128.
  • 9Habib R, Savannah CP, Wendy BD, et al. In vivo assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ grade: a model incorporating dynamic contrast-enha-need and diffusion-weighted breast MR imaging parameters [J]. Radi- ology, 2012, 263(2):374-382.
  • 10Mami L, Denis LB, Ryosuke O, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient as an MR imaging biomarker of low-risk ductal carcinoma in situ: a pilot study [J]. Radiology, 2011,260(2):364-372.

共引文献21

同被引文献73

引证文献10

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部