期刊文献+

论波普尔的思想实验观 被引量:1

On Popper's View of Thought Experiments
原文传递
导出
摘要 波普尔认为,当一个理论面临批判时,用思想实验来加以反驳,常会走向狡辩,因此是非法的。他对此类思想实验持排斥的态度。波普尔的思想实验观——特别是他所谓的狡辩式的思想实验的主张源于他对理想化导致不确定性后果的担心,是存在严重问题的。事实上,思想实验即为条件理想化的科学实验,其中错误因素主要来源于对条件考虑的不完善,而非理想化所致。理想化是思想实验的本质属性。 Popper believes that by using thought experiments to make a refutation when a theory is being criticized, we tend to be sophistical, which is illegitimate. He holds a negative attitude towards such thought experiments. Popper's view of thought experiments is problematic, especially when the view stems from his misgivings that idealization will bring about uncertain consequences. As a matter of fact, thought experiments are scientific experiments whose conditions are idealized, in which errors mainly come from the imperfect consideration about the conditions rather than the idealization. Idealization is the essence of thought experiments.
作者 赵煦
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期52-58,共7页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目"当代科学前沿背景下的思想实验研究"(项目编号:12CZX015) 江苏省社科基金项目"霍金的时空实在论思想研究"(项目编号:12ZXD015) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2014B19514)
关键词 狡辩式的思想实验 理想化 实验条件 Sophistical thought experiments Idealization Experimental conditions
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1卡尔·波普尔.科学发现的逻辑[M].北京:中国美术学院出版社,2008.
  • 2Brown, J. The Laboratory of the Mind[M]. London: Routledge, 1991, 33.
  • 3Norton, J. D. 'Thought Expriments in Einstein's Work' [J]. Thought Expriments in Science and Philosophy, 1991: 129- 148.
  • 4Irvine, A. 'Thought Expriments in Scientific Reasoning' [J]. Thought Experiments in Science and Philosophy, 1991 : 149-165.
  • 5Mach, E. 'On Thought Expriments' [A], Trans. C. M. Williams. Dordrecht. Knowledge and Error [C], Dordrecht: Reidel, 1976, 449-457.
  • 6Sorensen, R. Thought Expriments[M]. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1992, 165.
  • 7伽利略.关于两门新科学的对话[M].武际可译.北京:北京大学出版社,2006.66,277,148,148,148.
  • 8Norton, J. D. 'Are Thought Expriments Just What You Thought?' [J]. Canadian Joural of Philosophy, 1996, 26(3): 333-366.
  • 9W.海森伯.物理学和哲学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.28.
  • 10爱因斯坦、英费尔德.物理学的进化[M].周肇威译,长沙:湖南教育出版社,2010,5.

二级参考文献7

  • 1托马斯·库恩.《必要的张力》,范岱年,纪树立译,北京大学出版社,2004年版,第288--289页.
  • 2恩斯特.马赫.《认识与谬误》,洪佩郁译,东方出版社,2005,第167页;第169页;第169页;第172页;第175页;第171页.
  • 3J. Norton, "Thought Experiments in Einstein's Work", Horowitz and Massey Gerald (eds), Thought Experiments in Philosphy, Savage: Rowman and Littlefield, 1991, p. 129, p. 129.
  • 4J. Brown, The Laboratory of the Mind, London: Routledge, 1991, p. 33, p. 78, p. 65, p. 36.
  • 5拉瑞·劳丹.《进步及其问题》,刘新民译,北京:华夏出版社,1999,第50页.
  • 6R. Sorensen, Thought Experiments, Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1992, p. 3, p. 3, p. 3, p. 64, p. 205.
  • 7R. Cooper, "Thought Experiments", published online, Volume 36, Issue 3, Metaphilosophy, 2005, pp. 328 -347.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部