摘要
针对破损排水管道在选择非开挖修复技术时存在的多因素、多层次、多目标问题,以广州市中心城区地下排水管道非开挖修复为例,采用层次分析法,对DN300-800的排水管道,从施工条件、费用、效益等方面,分析比较了螺旋缠绕法、原位固化法和穿插法3种非开挖修复技术的适用性。结果表明,原位固化法比较适用于广州中心城区DN300-800排水管道的非开挖修复。
According to the typical dejects of sewer pipeline in the central urban area of Guangzhou City and multi-factor, multi-level and multi-target characteristics of trenchless rehabilitation technology decision, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is applied to compare the applicability of spiral wound lining method, cured-in-place pipe method and slip lining method, by analyzing their construction condition, cost, benefit etc.. The diameters of pipes range from 300 to 800 mm. Results show that cured-in-place pipe is preferable for this type of sewer pipeline rehabilitation.
出处
《给水排水》
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第3期94-97,共4页
Water & Wastewater Engineering
关键词
排水管道
非开挖修复
技术选择
层次分析法
Sewer pipeline
Trenchless rehabilitation
Technology selection
Analytic hierarchy process